Because mark has won a lot of games , has a lot of playoff experience , is no where near as bad as some people make him out to be and is one of the highest paid athletes in the entire word ALL sports ( golf, tennis, boxing , hockey , soccer you name it ) Benching him would be admitting a colossal error by the FO and Rex might be right , Sporano might only have 1 offense and Mark is better for it . A lot of successful QBs did not start for years , Tebow might not get another chance for years . A Tebow fan's argument is that he eventually should get a chance not that he is a hall of famer .its a perfectly reasonable stance that haters can't seem to grasp. So basically you , Phaytal. Slap, concerned , jetsetter34 all say he NEVER should get another chance , it's you guys that are acting moronic , it's hilarious to me and an endless source of entertainment , please continue ..You guys post in every single thread trying to derail it , it's not even debate anymore .
One of the main reasons I think a lot of teams didn't take a shot with Tebow is that he is a gamble. A Huge one. If your a head coach or a gm and u lobby to bring him in and start and it doesn't work out your going to lose your job almost guaranteed. More so then any other player, because of everything that comes with him. Kolb is a wash in Arizona, but that guy isn't in trouble. Has Tebow shown signs that he could be good yes, has he shown signs that he could be bad, definitively. Im a tebot to an extent and believe in him, but I would be hesitant to risk my career and livelyhood on him.
I would like to know what makes you a hater? It seems to me that if you say something bad about Tebow it makes u a hated.
Ok I'll keep giving precise answers . Hater : A person with an unreasonable bias When someone says " he is the worst QB ever" it's unreasonable When someone says " he will never start in the NFL " it's unreasonable When someone says " he belongs in the CFL" it's unreasonable When sme one says he deserves no credit for Denver's success last year , it's unreasonable I can make a list a mile long .
Those sounds like opinions? But the last one. I guess I'm a hater...I don't think he will ever EARN to be a starter.
On top of what I alrdy said the whole 32 teams can have him, but no one wants him thing is a myth. At any moment maybe 10 teams tops can change qbs. Either due to them alrdy having a franchise QB: NE, Denver, pitts, Giants, Greenbay, Saints QB who hinges on being franchise or not, either because they used to be or because they seem to be almost there and their team is doing great : Ravens, Cowboys, 49ers, Bears, Chargers(kinda),Texans, Falcons are tied to a recent high draft pick qb: Colts, Browns, Red skins, Jacksonville, Bengals, Vikings, Titans, Tampa (kinda), Panthers, Dolphins, Rams, Sea hawks, Raiders (traded 1sts for palmer) Are tied financially: Bills, Jets kinda, Cardinals kinda, Eagles kinda Generous options: Chiefs they don't have a starter at all Bills if the team is bad enough screw the money Titans if the team is bad enough anything is possible Buc's Josh freeman has been around for a bit and is inconsistent Browns franchise is a joke u never know. Eagles Everyone is on the hot seat Raiders If the team is bad enough anything is possible Chargers Rivers has been terrible and might be over the hill So being as generous as possible 8 teams can take him. out of those eight how many of their HC's and OC's have run based offensive philosophy's? maybe half. tldr: The teams who can take a qb at anytime is actually really low.
