zero revis doesnt have the flashy stat and sportswriters are all retarded and just look for the guy who has 10 picks or 18 sacks
I've heard a few different people on espn say they think he should win it so he will probably get some votes but I don't think he wins it. Not unless he returns 2 picks this sunday.
09'>11' and he did not win in 09' so I will say 0. His Giants performance was great though. Nice to know someone on the team showed up.
No chance simply because hes so shutdown he doesn't have the stats that the others have. He doesn't have many opportunities at interceptions simply because QB's don't throw at him nearly as much as they do to other DB's. IMO though he's easily the defense MVP of the league but I don't think he gets the votes since he didn't get them in 2009.
It's zero for the reasons already given, plus how the backlash that he cheats for his success (that he commits PI all the time) will also cost him votes from the uninformed and clueless.
He has a chance. Pierre-Paul, Suggs and Ware have shots too I guess. Babin or Allen? No way should they win it. Babin does not play the run well and Allen had a lot of worthless sacks. Allen sacks a guy on 2nd down. Vikings allow 3rd down conversion the next play. Happened a lot.
I'm thinking it's Terrell Suggs year. Best player on a top 3 defense and has been an absolute monster all year long. 13 sacks, 6 forced fumbles, 2 int's, the kind of mixed stats the voters love.