2010 NFC Divisional: Green Bay Packers vs. Atlanta Falcons

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Murrell2878, Jan 15, 2011.

  1. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    delete..........
     
  2. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well maybe not the Seahawks because I think they would have lost to the Eagles (Eagles would be the 3 and Seahawks would be the 6) but your suggestion is one that I've wanted the NFL to adopt for years after the NBA went to the seeding by record and record only route.
     
  3. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,679
    Likes Received:
    5,911
    absolutely.

    even last week, the Jets had to go to Indy simply because New England was better than them both; but there is no reason why the Colts should have had the home game on the sole basis that they played in a weaker division than the Jets, who still ended up with a better record. teams should be seeded on their own merit, not penalized simply because a better team plays in their division.
     
  4. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, I have no problem with the first round being seeded based on division, but after that it should really be re-seeded according to record.
     
  5. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Bill Simmons suggested that #1 seeds be allowed to choose their opponent.

    It was very unfair this year that Atlanta had to face arguably the best team in the NFC, while Chicago got one of the worst teams in the NFL.

     
  6. NYJalltheway

    NYJalltheway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,430
    Likes Received:
    2,518
    As retarded as this sounds at first glance reading that...it's actually a pretty cool idea. It would make the sport much more interesting and make for a better title game in most scenarios.
     
  7. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I now have a problem with the Wild Card round being seeded based on division championships. I do not believe the playoffs should be re-seeded after the Wild Card round.


    I don't like the system anymore. I think the top two seeds should go to the two best teams (by record) in the conference so long as they are not in the same division (by record the two best NFC teams were both from the South this season). You shouldn't get a bye if you don't win your division.

    The Falcons and Bears would have still been the 1 and 2 seeds.

    3-6 would have looked like this-
    3. Saints
    4. Packers
    5. Eagles
    6. Seahawks

    Such a system would have forced teams like the Eagles, Jets, and Chiefs to actually try to win in Week 17. Of course, the Jets won anyway in Week 17. I'm not sure Tomlinson, Revis, Greene, and Cromartie would have sat out that game, however.


    I remember a time in the NFL when winning your division would not guarantee a home playoff game.
     
    #147 Cakes, Jan 16, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2011
  8. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    888
    Yep, that's the way it should be
     
  9. Makia

    Makia Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    I did not think Atlanta would lose badly.
     

Share This Page