Deceptive Stat Of The Year ?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JetsKickAss, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. JetsKickAss

    JetsKickAss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    1,648
  2. nyjcanada

    nyjcanada Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    16
    They haven't got pressure all year. Pressures is probably a more important part of being consistent as a defense and it's clear we haven't had any kind of consistency against an average or better Oline.
     
  3. firemanedjr

    firemanedjr Active Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    1
    The Jets pressure isn't just designed to get sacks, it's designed to get QBs to make bad throws. How many fucking times does this have to get said? Sacks are great, but incomplete passes are pretty good too.
     
  4. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sacks =/= consistent pressure

    See 2008 Jets
     
  5. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    It is a deceptive stat. As others have pointed out, it's the pressure that counts. In 09 we had very few sacks but constant pressure, and no coincidence our D was more consistent.
     
  6. Pereiro16

    Pereiro16 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    2
    Revis's amount of interceptions makes you think he's a nobody.... and robbed him of DPOY last year
     
  7. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    We sacked Brady 3 times in the first half of that last game we played against them...do you think we got good pressure in that game?
     
  8. JonathonVilmaPwnsnub

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont believe its only completions that is the problem because by completion percent standards I believe the defense was very good. But the rest of the stats are up because of the lack of pressure. Big plays and touchdowns. Fewer interceptions.
     
  9. JetRizing89

    JetRizing89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    60
    sacks r meaningless

    the 09 game against the patriots proves this as miss america was running for his life all day yet the jets didnt get one sack
     
  10. SuperBowl50

    SuperBowl50 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    0
  11. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    It means what people should already know, sacks do not equal pressure.


    Just like interceptions do not mean good coverage, and completion percentage does not mean a good quarterback.
     
  12. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Steve032

    Steve032 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, it's actually designed to get sacks. However, Rex Ryan has developed a reputation and quarterbacks tend to have a shorter internal clock when playing against one of his defenses. Instead of a QB waiting 3 seconds to get rid of the ball, he might throw it after 2, which makes it harder for the Jets to get to the QB.
     

Share This Page