The Woodhead Factor

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by york61, Nov 26, 2010.

  1. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    You gotta admit, this isn't the same team from the beginning of the year.
     
  2. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    You could say that about 90% of the teams in the league.
     
  3. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    lol

    Yeah, I know. Pisses me off when I hear that about the Pats.

    The Jets were ground and pound in week two.
     
  4. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    We dont have the same offense from week 2.

    Week 2 was before the era of Santonio began.

    We are not a run first team anymore. Sure we still run the ball like hell, but when you got Santonio and Braylon being simply dominant, LT being FARRRR more effective on short passes than he is running, and Greene the Fumbling Machine this offense just aint the same.

    Woodhead coulda had him Xerox the whole damn book, and it wouldnt do them any good.
     
  5. Uzone27

    Uzone27 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Signing was full of win for the Pats on so many levels.

    They caught lightening in a bottle with this guy and they know it.
    On a psychological level they know that giving Danny a bit of job security after performing well for us (yet still being cut) can only bolster his on field performance and allegiance to the Pats organization..

    From a financial POV it is just the right length as the biggest fear with this guy is that he is a career ending injury waiting to happen.

    Trouble is no one can say for sure when and/or if that will actually happen.

    So appease the kid with a short extension, get his mind off his immediate future, and give him so time and room to cash in the chips on those broad shoulders his tiny frame is carrying around.

    Masterfully played by the Pats...

    I wish we could have kept him.

    PS they do this the week before the Jets vs Pats showdown?
    Fucking Genius.....
     
    #25 Uzone27, Nov 26, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2010
  6. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^ that is the greatest verbal blowjob I have ever read.

    Congrats... I guess.
     
  7. HardHitta

    HardHitta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,174
    Likes Received:
    234
  8. Uzone27

    Uzone27 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    You really need to get off the left nut skippy,

    If you have something above fifth grade smack to say just come out and say it.
    Otherwise shut the fuck up tool.
     
  9. FirstTimeCaller

    FirstTimeCaller Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    3
    Xeroxed? I wasn't aware people still used this term after the 1980's! Brilliant!
     
  10. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    What was that? Couldn't hear you with BB's balls in your mouth.
     
  11. Exit 117

    Exit 117 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    YOU'RE A LOSER BECAUSE YOU USE THE INTERNET, HEMI.

    BUT LET ME USE THE INTERNET AS MY MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION TO LET YOU KNOW YOU'RE A LOSER.


    loser.
     
  12. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,646
    Likes Received:
    5,860
    I guess you probably didn't mean xerox in the literal sense either and he could have used any brand copier? just checking, I wasn't an English lit kinda guy either.
     
  13. Uzone27

    Uzone27 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    This forum needs an ignore option.

    If you have issue with anything I have to say. I welcome intrlligent replies,
    It's what forums are for.

    Beyond that...go fuck yourself.
    Seriously.
     
  14. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0

    I need something intelligent to reply too. Your certainly not expecting a ton ball slurping on your part to inspire intelligent responses are you?
     
  15. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,646
    Likes Received:
    5,860
    but does this brilliantly insightful statement qualify as such:
    really? nobody can say for certain if or when an injury is going to occur? I was certain there were people among us that can see into the future. are you telling me Ms. Cleo doesn't know?
     
  16. Baumeister

    Baumeister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,951
    Likes Received:
    463
    1.)It has one genius not hard to find either.

    2.) Spell check
     
  17. Uzone27

    Uzone27 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    They

    I have to spell that out for you? Really? I am specifically talking about his stature here and the willingness of any front office to take a gamble on that.

    By being proactive and signing him now they avoid a situation where he could amass a body of work and ask for more years and more money.

    By signing a short term deal they hedge their bets against this little guy seriously getting his clock cleaned. If he survives the next two years they deal with it then.

    By signing him this week (of all weeks) they give him a shot of adrenaline against us next week.

    What am I missing? Why all the venomous responses?
     
    #37 Uzone27, Nov 27, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2010
  18. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    I’m not too worried about Woodhead becoming the x factor in this game, but in my opinion this was a terrible loss. I’d rather just let McKnight walk and kept Woodhead. Honestly it great to see McKnight find himself a place on the special teams (sarcasm):wink:; While Woodhead will contribute on another team and is very dangerous.
    I don’t think anyone can say "this will be McKnight’s moment”, but rest assured we will see Woodhead in some off balanced back field where he can gash us. Our rush is always over running the play and this little bastard is just fast enough to hurt us.
     
  19. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    You realize the McKnight move was a long term decision right? Woodhead wasn't seeing the field for us this year. That's why we kept the guy who's supposed to have a higher ceiling.
     
  20. JUNJOBX2199

    JUNJOBX2199 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do understand Woodhead has been around a couple of years and hasnt blown anyones socks off, but I personally do not like the move.

    I hope your right!
     

Share This Page