Nobody on that list jumps out to me as somebody who we should make a serious push (15-20 million guaranteed) to sign. Our team has plugged up the holes on the roster relatively well, now it's about depth
I thought the same thing - can't imagine he would cost much at this point and would seem to fill that Chris Baker type role - a good blocker who is also servicable as a short-yardage/redzone receiving TE. That is, if he's still playing at a decent level?
Use your head. 1. Seymour chooses where he wants to play. 2. I think some of the Raiders' FAs include: Morrison, Howard, Routt, Branch, and Janikowski. If they wanna keep this core, they're gonna have to spend some money. 3. He has expressed his displeasure at the possibility of being slapped with the Franchise Tag, esp by Oakland. Bottom line is, if Seymour is REALLY unhappy about playing in Oakland, he'll communicate this; and why would you pay someone who desperately wants nothing to do with yer team?
