Hartsock to get benched?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by gustoonarmy, Nov 5, 2009.

  1. IIMeanDeanII

    IIMeanDeanII Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,873
    Likes Received:
    7,483
    I can't disagree on the contract side of life. That isn't the topic at hand though. I was strictly talking about the skill gap between the two, and what they offered this team in comparison. I don't remember Baker having costly penalties to end important drives either, maybe I'm wrong.

    Regardless, I think we could've done much better then, Hartsock. Not much can be done now though, trade deadline has come and gone.
     
  2. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Who else was available?

    Hartsock coming lose from Atlanta during final cuts was a blessing as we were looking to enter the season with backup G at blocking-TE. He may have had a few boo-boos, but we got exactly what we expected and a little more when we signed him. His blocking has been excellent for a fraction of the price...and he has as many touchdowns as Baker on the season. The penalties suck, but it should never get to that point in the first place.
     
  3. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    It was a joke about the whole team being benched and not playing... because it's a bye week.
     
  4. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    Cut Hartscock. He's awful. Sign an out of work MMA fighter, who could do a better job at blocking who I'm pretty sure we could coach not to commit stupid penalties at the worst possible time.
     
  5. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whoosh. Swing and a miss.
     

Share This Page