It wasnt the most exciting draft, but Im really high on Clemens and Washington. I dont expect Washington to be our back of the future, but I think he can be a good returner and a great change of pace back
Good review... Very unbiased. I'm glad to see that the Front Office scouted so many players. This is another reason why I don't trust any of these ANALysts when they say these guys were reaches...
Yeah Im not sure but I think most teams scouted around 250ish...so we scouted 200 more than the average team, or something along those lines. Or maybe Im having false memories...
I thinks Jaworski had Cutler rated above Young and Leinart in the draft. As for Clemens I know he was high on him; I think he mightve been one of the guys that had him #1, Im not sure though, that might be false memories
So you wrote this yourself and the "scouting 450 players" thing and the "Clemmons was the #1 QB on some boards" thing was just you talking?
Good stuff, however considering the top 3 picks were given A or higher a final grade of B seems a little harsh. Higher picks have to have more impact in the grading.
Actually if Clemens doesn't break his ankle he is in the running to be a mid to late first rounder. Kiper must have said that a dozen times.
MSNCB (for what they are worth) and ESPN gave us excellent grades on our draft..... mixed sentiment seems to range from B to A+. For rookies running their first draft, it could have been a lot worse. - and maybe not much better.