Jets Offensive Philosophy???

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JETSJETS, Apr 9, 2009.

  1. bigalxc

    bigalxc Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like the philosophy of scoring more points then your opponents
     
  2. Heavy Metal Thunder

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    8
    Offensive philosophy: The first two plays in the playbook will look something like this...

    1) Intercept, take to the house for 6.
    2) Force fumble, recover, take to the house for 6.
     
  3. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    Offense? Not necessary. This is what scares me the most about Ryan as a HC. He seems to think all you need to win in the NFL is a dominant defense, and he appears content to have a QB who does nothing but hand the ball off and throw the occasional WR screen. Safe, conservative, don't turn the ball over. Let your defense win the game for you.
     
  4. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    That's the only thing I don't agree with... i'd like the offense to be just as important. i find that frustrating.
     
  5. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    The only thing worse than losing is losing record while playing boring football. Welcome back to the Chad Pennington years.
     
  6. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    its going to be worse than that.

    Pennington made the play action look real good.. hopefully schotty's pre snap movements will be entertaining enough.
     
  7. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    There's been no moves out there worth making atm. No receivers in FA was worth spending big money on, and we have a shitload of complementary receivers as is....no need to sign anymore. Only receiver out there worth signing is Torry Holt and if he's looking for one more big payday before he retires than no thanks.

    And what's he supposed to say about the QB situation?? 'Our QBs blow I have no faith in Clemens or that dude from Utah'. Maybe our FO is targetting Sanchez and is looking to move up 10 spots and drafting Sanchez.

    We've been making moves on defense cus they're the moves worth making. Bart Scott is a stud ILB, Lito Sheppard could very well be the perfect complement to Darrelle Revis and we only got him for a 5th and a conditional pick that could be a steal if we use the Saints strategy and Jim Leonhard was a no brainer at 3 years 6 million.

    We haven't even hit the draft, this team is far from finished.
     
  8. JohnnyJohnson

    JohnnyJohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    6,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    We'll have the same O that Chad ran, minus the man love.
     
  9. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    This obviously remains to be seen, but I seriously doubt we run the same offense. The ball control aspect? Yes. However, we'll mix in the deep ball to varying degrees in order to free up the short game. How much we do so likely depends on who is under center.
     
  10. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think we will have the same offensive scheme, but not the same offense. Until his last season, Chad was incredibly accurate. Clemens is not (and Ratliff is a questions mark). So you are going to get a boring offensive scheme with a QB that can't execute it, most likely.

    I have been fairly dismissive of Ainge, but coming out of school he was considered a poor man's Chad Pennington. So, maybe he would be the best fit after all.
     
  11. doug4563

    doug4563 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    29
    Really??? Last I checked, these free agents WRs didn't sign monster contracts and could have helped the Jets:

    Bryant Johnson
    Nate Washington
    Devery Henderson
    Shaun McDonald
    Lance Moore (RFA)
     
  12. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no idea why they didn't make a play for Nate Washington. (Then again, I am not a professional evaluator of talent.)
     
  13. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Washington signed a 6 year 27 million dollar contract, that's a pretty big contract and I don't think he's a number 1 receiver. Bryant Johnson isn't better than anything we have on our roster already. Henderson is a burner with great speed but questionable hands. McDonald is nothing special and again another complementary player. And Lance Moore has a second round tender, is he really worth a second round pick?
     
  14. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    For Rex's offense to run properly we need PETTIGREW!
     
  15. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    I thought the Ravens throw down field more than the quick throws once they had confidence in the QB. I suspect we will run heavy but throw over the top alot more than people think. Ryan has an attack mentality and I have a feeling when it's his ball and bat he is going to attack the field and down the field when we throw the ball.
     
  16. YOYOYO

    YOYOYO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    799
    Likes Received:
    66
    It's going to be BORING
     
  17. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    6 years, $27mm w/ $9mm guaranteed is not #1 WR-type money.

    Coles got 4 years, $27mm w/ $9.75mm guaranteed from the Bengals and he is on the wrong side of 30.

    Houshmanzadeh who is 31 got 5 years, $40mm w/ $15mm guaranteed this offseason.
     
  18. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    No it's not #1 money but either he or Cotchery would be our #1 and I don't know if either is suitable for the role.
     
  19. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't look at either as a #1 per se, either. But the Jets would have had two big WRs that complement each other. A possession guy and a deep threat.
     
  20. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    That all depends on who's making the calls. Is Rex calling the plays or letting Shotty take full control as was reported early on after his signing.
     

Share This Page