Draft Mark Sanchez?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009.

?

Should the Jets draft Mark Sanchez?

  1. No

    111 vote(s)
    57.2%

  2. Only if he's available at 17.

    70 vote(s)
    36.1%

  3. Trade up if necessary.

    13 vote(s)
    6.7%
Page 1 of 6
  1. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm not betraying my position (largely because the initial tenor of a thread can influence poll results). I'm curious as to how Jets fans feel.
     
    #1 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
  2. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    I don't think he'll be there when it's our turn. Honest. *** Edit *** and no, I would not.
     
    #2 Mehl-56, Apr 2, 2009
  3. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    If he falls out of the top 10 they need to trade up. He's better then Stafford.
     
    #3 mj2sexay, Apr 2, 2009
  4. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    I tentatively agree.
     
    #4 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
  5. nyjcanada

    nyjcanada Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    16
    nope... go kellen
     
    #5 nyjcanada, Apr 2, 2009
  6. YOYOYO

    YOYOYO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    799
    Likes Received:
    66
    He will be gone at 4
     
    #6 YOYOYO, Apr 2, 2009
  7. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    Possible, but that doesn't answer the question.
     
    #7 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
  8. RevisCB

    RevisCB New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, don't think he is the answer, try our own guys, and if not there are plenty of QB's available in 2010.
     
    #8 RevisCB, Apr 2, 2009
  9. GBA

    GBA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,690
    Likes Received:
    126
    No. He definitely won't fall very far and I'm happy with what we have. If we did draft him however I suppose I could find a way to live with it.
     
    #9 GBA, Apr 2, 2009
  10. tpjets62

    tpjets62 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed!! Lets see what we got!!
     
    #10 tpjets62, Apr 2, 2009
  11. YOYOYO

    YOYOYO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    799
    Likes Received:
    66
    Yea it does b/c while he would be a great get they can't get that high.
     
    #11 YOYOYO, Apr 2, 2009
  12. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sure they could. It would take a lot, but it's hardly impossible.
     
    #12 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
  13. RevisCB

    RevisCB New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would take way too much to get that high for a guy who is completely unproven
     
    #13 RevisCB, Apr 2, 2009
  14. bundas699

    bundas699 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't think drafting him will be possible because we missed out on Cutler now Denver will trade up in the draft and get him early... So see the one mistake of not getting Cutler will cost us this QB also...
     
    #14 bundas699, Apr 2, 2009
  15. RevisCB

    RevisCB New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow that trade was even better than i first thought then :smile:
     
    #15 RevisCB, Apr 2, 2009
  16. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Absolutely not.
     
    #16 Yisman, Apr 2, 2009
  17. YOYOYO

    YOYOYO Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    799
    Likes Received:
    66
    They could but if they weren't willing to pony up for a proven QB why do it for one thats not proven?
     
    #17 YOYOYO, Apr 2, 2009
  18. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best case scenario has the Jags taking Stafford, the 49ers taking Sanchez, and the Broncos reeeeeaching for Freeman at 12. Couple that with the Raiders passing on a receiver, and we could have Maclin fall to us at 17.
     
    #18 ........, Apr 2, 2009
  19. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    You didn't address my argument.
     
    #19 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
  20. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's not the point. The point is that saying "he'll go at 4" doesn't answer the question. If you think the ammunition required to get to 4 is too steep, fine. But that's a completely different statement.
     
    #20 Keeper1125, Apr 2, 2009
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 6

Share This Page