It's not even implied, if you read between the lines that thats what Law says... This Fat Bastard should have his Journalism credentials revoked... when I saw this picture, I think I threw up in my mouth a little.
Who is his editor? Writers write the stories and columns but they don't make the headlines; editors do that. There column's not bad, it's the headline that's so bad.
Law is going to get "lit up" like a Christmas tree if he plays tonight. BTW, who's the fat guy with no neck? Did he eat the reporter?
OK, this seems a little irresponsible to me. That is just way too vague a lead into the Lowery quote. What exactly was the question to which Lowery was responding? "Dwight, are you happy with the Law signing?" or "Dwight, is this signing a reflection of your struggles?" or "Dwight, is this a sign that the coaches have lost faith in you?" There is way too much room for speculation there and it's irresponsible journalism. As far as the Law quote being extrapolated into "Law Dares Pats," that is beyond irresponsible. But then again, it's the NY Post, a daily that makes the Weekly World News look Pulitzer-worthy.
:rofl2: good one! I think he can cover Welker....I'd put him on Welker, and play inside technique, Welker isn't going to run down the sideline on Law, and if they try to get him the ball that way, that plays into Law's Ballhawking stregnth.
im tryna be optimistic about law, but i didnt think lowery was doing that bad...welker is gonna run circles around law...law shouldnt talk shit since hes been on his ass eating chips and watching the season go by for the last 10 weeks
