Final Roster

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Popeye's Army, Aug 30, 2008.

  1. Popeye's Army

    Popeye's Army New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    0
    4 QB & only 2 RB on the roster

    it does seem possible that a QB for a RB trade might be in the works
     
  2. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    2) I was under the impression that Clowney is only out for the first six weeks with a broken collarbone.
     
  3. kevmvp

    kevmvp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,864
    Likes Received:
    643
    They probably figure that if any of our starting lineman get hurt we are screwed anyway lol.
     
  4. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,084
    Likes Received:
    14,327
    Clowney should have been cut. Stuckey will be a solid #3/4 and Brad Smith looked good vs. the Giants. Henry can serve as the #5.
     
  5. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    After that preseason and potential? He's 23 years old!!

    You gotta let him on this team.
     
  6. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,084
    Likes Received:
    14,327
    Thats exactly why he is on the team. A potential#3 (at best)/4/5 WR out atleast 6 weeks is a risky keeper to me.
     
  7. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    After the way he's performed, it would be pretty stupid to cut him.
    Besides, i think they would've cut him already, if they didn't plan on keeping him.
     
  8. Popeye's Army

    Popeye's Army New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    0
    everything depends on the severity of the break

    Seahawks just IR'd WR Ben Obomanu with a broken clavicle
     
  9. Mr. Papagiorgio

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm surprised they didn't put Clowney on PUP for the first 6 weeks. They must think he can come back much sooner.
     
  10. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    they can't put anyone of them on the practice squad cause someone will sign them and they want k.c. b.r. and e.a. back next year in case favre retires.i can see e.a being out on the i.r. when chatman is elgible to return in wk 5 with some kinda mysterious injury.
     
  11. APK 8

    APK 8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,923
    Likes Received:
    171
    The Jets knew (or at least should have known) that Chatman's suspension was a possibility when they signed him. He tested positive at the end of last season.

    http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/08/30/chatman-tested-positive-for-masking-agent/

    So, Mangini was aware of the issue. He therefore isn't going to cut Chatman over the positive test.
     
  12. favrefan

    favrefan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    o man that sucks David Ball got cut, I wish you guys would have gave him more of a shot.
     
  13. Mr. Papagiorgio

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even if he retires, you don't need to groom 3 QBs. Keep the two best younger QBs. You're just taking reps away from the others. Heck, there are a lot of teams now that only keep 2 QBs. It seems like a waste of a roster spot to keep 4 QBs.
     
    #33 Mr. Papagiorgio, Aug 30, 2008
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2008
  14. Jetsetter

    Jetsetter Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,928
    Likes Received:
    22
    I agree with you. Maybe Clemens can be used in a trade, although that might have happened earlier in the preseason.
     
  15. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    qbs with 1-3 years in the league can be great bargaining chips come draft time steve walsh used to draft a qb every year for that reason.i agree that 4 is alot but the way the situation worked out with chatman its easy to do now.
    i wonder how it woulda shaked out if chatman hadn't been suspended
     
  16. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Bill Walsh you meant. I've seen that quote, too.

    The problem is Walsh did not exactly practice what he preached. He did not draft a QB every year.

    The following was originally posted by me here in May-


    Quarterbacks drafted by San Francisco during Bill Walsh's tenure as head coach-

    1979- Joe Montana, 3rd round
    1980- Dan Hartwig, 9th round
    1981- Joe Adams, 12th round
    1982- Bryan Clark, 9th round
    1983- none
    1984- none
    1985- Scott Barry, 6th round
    1986- none
    1987- John Paye, 10th round
    1988- none


    Walsh was the SF GM from 1999-2001 and then was a consultant for three years after that.

    QBs drafted by SF in those years-
    1999- none
    2000- Giovanni Carmazzi, 3rd round and Tim Rattay, 7th round
    2001- none
    2002- Brandon Doman, 5th round
    2003- Ken Dorsey, 7th round
    2004- Cody Pickett, 7th round


    Walsh may have said it is good to draft a QB every year, but he did not actually always draft a QB every year.

    I think it is interesting to look at one of his proteges- Mike Holmgren. He actually drafted some good QBs who were used as backups and then were traded.

    Green Bay
    1992- Ty Detmer, 9th round
    1993- Mark Brunell, 5th round
    1994- none
    1995- Jay Barker, 5th round
    1996- Kyle Wachholtz, 7th round
    1997- Ronnie McAda, 7th round
    1998- Matt Hasselbeck, 6th round

    Seattle
    1999- Brock Huard, 3rd round
    2000- none
    2001- Josh Booty, 6th round
    2002- Jeff Kelly, 7th round
    2003- Seneca Wallace, 4th round
    2004- none
    2005- David Greene, 3rd round
    2006- none
    2007- none
    2008- none
     
  17. MarionBarber31

    MarionBarber31 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another perspective on the 53...

    It is important to remember that only 45 suit up each week, since 8 are inactive. Thus there will be TWO QBs inactive each week, which actually ADDS another player (non QB) to be available for each game.

    So the 4 QBs doesn't actually hurt us on game day, allowing for an additional position player to be activated who would otherwise not be suiting up.
     
  18. BacktoQueens

    BacktoQueens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,166
    Likes Received:
    6,542
    I think the coaching staff got it right!
    I'm very happy with the final roster. I'd have switched Poteat for Carroll though no questions. That's my only criticism.

    I was really hoping Brown, Murrell, and Cummings all made the team. Their play deserved it. Also happy with the Oline final selections. Bender especially had to go. His play was just awful at every position. He'll make it to PS if they want to keep developing him, as will Garner.

    7 WR's is a lot, but Wright is a good call for ST, and Clowney earned his spot.

    Good job overall!
     
  19. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311

    Excelent point. Keeping 4 QB's is the Jets way of protecting thier assets. If Ratliff had not had the type of preseason he did we would only be keeping 3. Its not a major issue. Changes can be made all year long if needed.
     
  20. Popeye's Army

    Popeye's Army New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    0

    I think the only player you could make a case for keeping is Poteat over Barrett - primarily due to salary. But the coaching staff has obviously considered that decision carefully. So I'm comfortable with their choice.

    Other than that I really don't think anyone can complain about letting these guys go. They were definitely the bottom tier of the roster.

    And remember 7 or 8 of them will end up on the practice squad. So we haven't said our final goodbye's to all of them yet.
     
    #40 Popeye's Army, Aug 31, 2008
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2008

Share This Page