3rd reciever: speed or size

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by MyFavoriteMartin5, Apr 7, 2008.

?

Which type of 3rd receiver do you want for this team?

Poll closed Apr 28, 2008.
  1. Speed: home run hitter

    25 vote(s)
    31.6%
  2. Size: 6'4+ red zone target

    54 vote(s)
    68.4%
  1. MyFavoriteMartin5

    MyFavoriteMartin5 New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that when the Jets are on the clock in the second round they could very well have Manningham and Hardy on the board. Now I'm not saying they have to take a receiver at the 2nd round, but this team does need a 3rd receiver. The question is do we need the speedster, or the red zone target. Thoughts?
     
  2. JETSimpala

    JETSimpala New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would go for size.
    We need a Red-Zone threat and someone not afraid to go up and get it.
    Someone like Vincent Jackson (from the Chargers) would be a dynamic target in the red-zone, and even so... there are great receivers in Coles and Cotchery, and even in the TE with Baker and Franks.
     
  3. FrankTheTank

    FrankTheTank New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    both.

    fillllllller
     
  4. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's no doubt in my mind that we need size. Hardy's the man there.
     
  5. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    8,945
    Likes Received:
    1,787
    i should have read the post before i did the poll, the jets need a big receiver bad.


    however typically i would want one of my top 2 receivers to be the big possession type receiver and bring in the speedster when you go 3 wide.
     
  6. jixxjr

    jixxjr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    1,540
    Likes Received:
    238
    I'd say speed simply because we really don't have any (blink and/or one missed tackle, and he's gone) at the WR spot. At least none that scares opposing Defenses.
     
  7. SameOldJets2008

    SameOldJets2008 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    0
    good thread... normally for a team you want your third to be a guy that can catch well and has speed to run the seam route effectively. On this team however i would want A tall reciever ala Hardy. In the beginning he could play slot yes, but in two years when Coles is gone. Hardy could be the number 1 while Cotch is the sure handed 2, Fitz Boldin esque. Then we could have this discussion all over again in two years for another #3
     
  8. FITM

    FITM 2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    When your tallest WR is Brad Smith at 6-2, you have to go for size.
     
  9. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    BTW Hardy runs a 4.47 40 and is 6-7, so he's by no means slow, especially for his size. I'm speaking of that particular scenario said in the OP.

    Our red zone offense is anemic and a smaller speed threat won't help that.
     
    #9 MobiusOne28, Apr 7, 2008
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2008
  10. Nesquik

    Nesquik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    398
    Id much rather have Manningham he is going to be the best reciever in this draft 3 years from now.
     
  11. notjustQBs

    notjustQBs New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Speed is what we need. We need speed to strike some fear in the DBs. Can Chanci still run? Who is the one in the draft that can 4.2 it?
     
  12. bigalxc

    bigalxc Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    I want Devin Thomas as #3 WR
     
  13. notjustQBs

    notjustQBs New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't talk to me at less than 4.4...

    Andre Caldwell, Fla, 6-0-1/4 - 204 Lbs., 4.37 forty
    Eddie Royal, Va.Tech, 5-9-5/8 - 184 Lbs., 4.39 forty
    Dexter jackson, Appalachian St., 5-9-1/2, 182 Lbs., 4.37 forty
    William Franklin, Missouri, 6-0, 214 Lbs., 4.37 forty
    Donnie Avery, Houston, 5-11, 192 Lbs., 4.40 forty
     
  14. FOURTHANDLONG

    FOURTHANDLONG Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    2
    Depends on our Qb. Speed for Kellen Size for Chad. Size and speed would be nice though.
     
  15. JackBower

    JackBower Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,277
    Likes Received:
    6,321
    I think we need another big target, if it was choosing between the two and not having the luxury to get a guy who has both.
     
  16. GSourJr

    GSourJr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,789
    Likes Received:
    0
    Chancy Stuckey is supposed to be our burner deep threat--the role Dedrick Ward played so well back in 1998 with Keyshawn and Chrebet working the intermediate stuff.

    Therefore, I vote for the big target. Our red zone offense is atrocious. A better line will help.

    Only thing is, Jets are a fade-happy team--what will they do when they finally get a big man on the team?
     
  17. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Let's get a QB before we worry about a receiver that neither of our current QBs will ever get the ball to anyway. At least not if they are more than 10 yards from the line of scrimmage.
     
  18. notjustQBs

    notjustQBs New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can't fault these QBs until they get an NFL quality OL in front of them. If they both suck behind an OL that can keep the Defense at bay then you can groan, gnash and complain all you want.

    We need speed. Speed is what we need. If Chanci can stay healthy (which remains to be seen) then he can compete for a job -- but we need to draft some serious speed to freak out the DBs.
     
  19. VickBlows

    VickBlows Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    6
    We should just keep with 5’ 7” whining, non catching receivers and call it a day. I cant imaging the passing game is of any priority this year anyway – I’d say the goals are to sure up the lines and get the running game going.

    Unless we can find a receiver bad ass enough to throw to himself – it’s a waste of time because we sure as hell don’t have a quarterback from what I’ve see so far.
     
  20. nyjcanada

    nyjcanada Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    16
    as 3rd WR do you mean in the slot? because isn't that where you would generally want a speedy guy?
     

Share This Page