Will it ever happen?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by RochesterJet, Jan 13, 2008.

  1. RochesterJet

    RochesterJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,954
    Likes Received:
    982
    After watching the Pats game last night and then looking at the Jets depth chart this morning; I came to a conclusion that many of you have over the past two seasons?.OUR DEFENSE IS NOT EVEN IN THE SAME ROOM AS THE PATS

    I will never understand this coaching staff?s utter infatuation with the 3-4. We clearly don?t have the personnel in place from the 1st team, to the practice squad. Shaun Ellis and David Harris are the only two players in the front seven that even fit the mould of a 3-4 player; ok maybe moving Victor Hobson to the inside would have worked too, but he?s on his way out.
    Speaking of players on their way out, you can add Eric Barton to the FA pile. Eric is a very good, not great or bad?.but VERY good weak side LB in a 4-3 scheme; yup he will be gone now too leaving us even less flexibility. But hey we still have Brad Kassell (are you kidding me) and Bryon Thomas (for another 4 years of nothing).
    Guys, we are not a year or two away on this defense like we thought 3 years ago when Vilma won ROTY and Ellis was reeking havoc on the QB, Drob?well still sucked. AT least we were very competitive on that side of the ball..
    So what to do? Revert back to a 4-3?ok I?m down with that but since we have been gearing up for the 3-4 we have players that don?t fit the 4-3 either.

    Guys all I know is that we have a big mess; let me rephrase?and insurmountable mess on the defensives side of the ball (well the offense it in pretty bad shape too but that?s another thread). We are in a defense that does not fit our personnel; plain and simple. I don?t care how good your scheme is or how ?exotic? some of your blitz packages are, until we get the players this 3-4 will never work.


    You?re the GM/coach?what do you do? Give me your line up of front 7 in either a 3-4 or 4-3?.yes you can utilize FA and the draft (but keep it real not madden). Here is mine


    RE- Ellis
    DT- DROB
    DT- Corey Williams, UFA, Green Bay Packers
    A starting defensive tackle for a rejuvenated and strong Green Bay team, Williams has helped the Packers become one of the better defensive units around. Williams has been able to tally seven sacks?matching his 2006 total?along with 32 total tackles and three forced fumbles. He has been very disruptive and will receive very strong interest as a free agent this upcoming offseason.
    DE-Vernon Gholston plays what Ohio State calls the "Leo" end, a position that has to both pass rush and be able to drop into coverage when the Buckeyes are playing zone. He possesses excellent speed for a player his size and shows good instincts playing the run and the pass. According to Ohio State's athletic website, Gholston benches 455 lbs., making him one of the strongest players on the team. Gholston shows tremendous promise. He displays good pass rushing moves and rarely will you find him out of position. After deciding to declare, Gholston should go somewhere between the top to middle of the first round.
    SSLB-Karlos Dansby, UFA, Arizona Cardinals
    Dansby may very well end up being the cream of the crop in terms of linebackers during the next free agency period. He has excellent size and is coming into his own as a top level defensive player. He?s only 26 years old and has three consecutive seasons of 80 or more tackles, including this season in which he has totaled 95 tackles. He collected three interceptions in ?05, has collected three more this season, and had an impressive eight sacks in ?06. He has four forced fumbles and 3.5 sacks this season. Being young, strong, and talented should land him a large contract, and the Cardinals could be the team locking him up very soon.
    MLB- David Harris
    WSLB- Jonathan Vilma
     
  2. Joe Willie White Shoes

    Joe Willie White Shoes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    8,145
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    The Jets are not going to a 4-3. Period.

    As for the Pats defense, I think it is vulnerable. The Jags did what they had to do offensively last night. I think the Pats defense stopped the Jags three times - one turnover in the first quarter, one punt in the second half, and the late turnover. The Jags stopped themselves. Two dropped TD passes led to FGs insteand of TDs and that would have made a 28-20 game into a 28-28 game.

    If you really want to compare the major difference between the two teams, it is the OL. After the first series, Brady did not get touched by a Jaguar. The OL gave Brady all day to throw against the Jags conservative game plan and he picked them apart. The only time the Pats offense was stopped all night was the missed FG. The Pats offense won that game last night, not the defense. If the defense plays well, that game is blowout. The Giants also moved the ball against the Pats.

    As for your front 7, I think it's time for Ellis and/or D Rob to go if they do not restructure their contracts. They are both among the highest paid players on the team and the highest paid DLs in the NFL and the production does not match. Robertson plays hard, but is out of position and may not be a fit for 3-4. at least at NT and he is probably too short to play DE. Ellis has been a waste of $40 million so far. He took the big money and became invisible. An average DE who is paid $1-2 million a year can produce at the same level - 3-4 sacks a year and a tackle here or there with no real impact plays. Signing him was a big mistake.
     
  3. johnnysd

    johnnysd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,387
    Likes Received:
    158

    The Jets play a lot of 4-3 and are no more effective at that then the 3-4 alignment. They do not have the players for a traditional 4-3 either. The best fit would likely be a one gap 3-4 like the Cowboys and Chargers play. That said, our defense after the bye was quite acceptable. Fix the offense and the defense will seem even better.
     
  4. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    We don't have the personnel for 4-3, so to switch to it would be insane. Let them build the defense they want and then judge them on it once it is in place.
     
  5. wildaces

    wildaces Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    I couldn't agree more. We have the personnel that we can show different looks. Hell we even came out in a one down lineman look. After the bye we started looking like a defense, with a couple key additions, could be a top 15 defense quickly. I think that we will start seeing a predominate 3-4 D with looks of 4-3, & 4-4.

    With that said look, for our FO to add a couple of 3-4 style DL in the draft. I want Kendal Langford late.


    We need to fix the OL the rest will fall into place.
     
  6. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    7,206
    I'm surprised that yesterday's game resulted in an epiphany for you regarding the Pats' defense, since it played okay, but hardly great (the Jags had 358 yards of total offense, just about their season average). The place where the Jets aren't in the same time zone as the Pats is on offense - they averaged almost 100 yards per game less on offense, but only 35 yards per game more on defense, and scored 20 points per game less, while giving up 5 points per game more.
     
  7. IIMeanDeanII

    IIMeanDeanII Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,874
    Likes Received:
    7,484
    So.. I dont understand why the defense is usually always getting crucified on these boards. I mean, there are holes, dont get me wrong. We are not as dynamic as a lot of these top D's, yet. So surely that is something that we are drooling at the mouth for.

    When I watch the games that we had played last year, we struggled so much more on offense the entire year. We had flash's of good things to build around, but overall it was terrible. IMO. I am not a stat buff, but I am willing to bet our O-Line probably would've placed in the top 5 worst O-lines last season.

    Our offense put our D in some of the worst spots last season, and they made due with what they were given. Considering the lack of talent we had on both sides of the line, in the trenches especially. If I was to give an epiphany over what unit is in the worst critical shape, it would not be the D.
     
  8. ess-dog

    ess-dog New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did I miss something? When did Ellis ever wreak havoc on the QB? The guy has been nothing better than an average starter for his entire career.
     
  9. jonnyd

    jonnyd 2007 TGG.com Funniest Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    13,035
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    thats what I was thinking....if this turns out to be a 3 or 4 year rebuilding mission, I would hope we are shooting for a better defense than the pats have now.....its CLEARLY their unstoppable offense that is winning these games.....
     
  10. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Pats defense is still as good as anyone in the league. They know their offense can score 40 points a game so instead of trying to shut teams out they play a bend but don't break where they still take away one of the opposing teams weapons. They want to give you the middle of the field and and then if you actually have a long drive and get into the red zone they want you kicking field goals. Most teams can't sustain a 10 play drive without screwing up with a pick, holding etc... So the Pats know on a good percentage of their drives that they are scoring touchdowns. They know few if any teams are going to put together multiple long drives to keep up with them. They still have an unbelievable defensive line that occupies most of the offensive line. They have 4 veteran linebackers that know their role and rarely miss tackles. They have a secondary mostly built from within that play within the scheme. It's a very good defense.
     
  11. jdon

    jdon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Likes Received:
    527
    Good grief. Another 4-3 vs 3-4 post. Hello, it is not going to change with Mangini here. That is that. Get used to it. What is wrong is the fact that Tangini lacked the guts to get rid of personnel they wanted out after a 10-6 season. They were right the first time. They should have stuck with the plan they said they had. They chickened out because they had some unexpected success. A tougher schedule this year proved that they were right in the first place. Of course, they have lost a year in talent development and acquisition because of their cowardice. Just look at net year as Year Two of the ?-Year Plan.
     
  12. Rambo13

    Rambo13 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jets aren't going back to the 4-3 but even if they did I would expect them to align:
    SLB - David Harris
    MLB - Jonathan Vilma
    WLB - Karlos Dansby
     
  13. JetsLookingforDWare

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Da 43 Is Dah Bes!!!!!
     
  14. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    lool rofl no u suk 34 betar den 43.


    This post brought to you by Sarcasm?.
     
  15. AtlantaJet

    AtlantaJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    651
    Sometimes one is unable to see the forest for the trees. The defense actually played pretty well the second half of the year. A couple more impact player and the defense may be very good. The offense is a totally different story!
     
  16. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    I thought the question was "will it ever happen, the Jets contend for the AFC."

    Because simply I don't see it. Despite their loss, New England and Indy are the class of the AFC, Brady, great coach, great front office. Peyton, great coach, great front office.

    San Diego and Jacksonville are on the rise, and they all have QBs. Pittsburgh is good, and have a good QB. Tennessee is on the rise.

    I just don't see it. Will this team contend for a wild-card? Much less a division title or conference title?

    I just don't see it.
     
  17. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even if Pitt, SD, NE, Indy and Jax make the playoffs (and I can't imagine they all will...) that still leaves one wild card to be filled by whichever other AFC side can sneak to 10 wins. Tennessee, Denver, Cleveland and Cincinnati will all fancy it, we're in a boat with Baltimore, Oakland, KC, Buffalo, Miami and Houston - unfancied.
     
  18. BigGorilla

    BigGorilla New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anyone have a breakdown of which teams are 4-3 or 3-4 ?
     
  19. statjeff22

    statjeff22 2008 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    7,206
    Perhaps these glasses will help you see it more clearly?

    [​IMG]
     
  20. ihatethedolphins3

    ihatethedolphins3 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    0
    none of this defense talk will ever matter until we have a quarterback, which i dont know if we do right now
     

Share This Page