But he never admitted to knowingly using steroids, that's why he is going on trial for perjury remember? Clemens could use the same bs excuse and some of the Yankee homers would believe it.
You made an argument about taking steroids... not knowingly taking them... nice try... but no... I know you're crushed Arod wasn't on the list... let it go
I thought they were on the list... but if not the better question is how does Dykstra get named and Sosa & McGuire don't?
Right...this is what you're not getting. The only names in the Mitchell report are the ones that came up in this particular investigation, centered around Radomski and McNamee. Sosa and McGwire were getting their juice somewhere else. That's all.
I'm not saying Bonds didn't and did do. My argument is that how can you defend Clemens and accuse Bonds of essentially the same thing. Why would I be crushed Arod isn't on the list? Clearly you have no clue what you are talking about. I think your crushed because your beloved Clemens is a now known cheat.That being said I'm upset that Pettite is on the list he's one of the few Skanks I liked and respected.
I agree but this is being sold to the public as the definitive report and the only report that will ever be done. There should have never been any report with any names unless it was complete or as complete as possible.
Clemens can go suck a bag of dicks for all I'm concerned... It's not about Clemens for me... It's about Mitchell working for the Red Sox and not being impartial... And Mitchell has been a hack for years... this is the same guy who had his lunch handed to him by Ollie North during Iran Contra... When the NY Times basically calls you a fool and your a democrat, you know there's something wrong...
Did anyone think that ALL the steroid users in baseball would be on this list? They were wrong. This is probably the only report that will ever be done. And it likely was as complete as it possibly could have been, going off the testimony off just 2 people.
I also never heard it said in the media. I think some individuals mistakenly thought this would be some all-encompassing report, as opposed to the product of limited cooperation and resources which it was.
He in fact pointed out that there are plenty of users who remained unknown. I don't see why everyone's mad at him. We have no reason to question his integrety.
