AFC East Fillability Index - Cold, Hard Football Facts for May 7, 2007 ~ ~ ~

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by kelly, May 8, 2007.

  1. kelly

    kelly Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    AFC East Fillability Index
    Cold, Hard Football Facts for May 7, 2007

    See the AFC North here
    ***
    By Jonathan Comey / Cold, Hard Football Facts contributor

    We start today with what should be the NFL's power division in 2007: the AFC East. It posted the best out-of-division record in the NFL in 2006 (23-17) and, for the most part, its teams look they'll be even better in 2007.

    AFC EAST:

    ~ ~ ~ N.Y. JETS (10-6)
    How they ranked in 2006
    Total O Score O Rush O Pass O Total D Score D Rush D Pass D
    25 18 20 17 20 6 24 14

    2006 Quality Stat rankings
    Scoreability Off. Hog Pass YPA Bendability Def. Hog Def. Pass Rating
    15 22 16 4 19t 12

    Additions:
    QB Marques Tuiasosopo (Oakland)
    FB Darian Barnes (Miami)
    RB Thomas Jones (Chicago)
    DE Kenyon Coleman (Dallas)
    DE David Bowens (Miami)

    Subtractions:
    RB B.J. Askew (Tampa Bay)
    QB Patrick Ramsey (Denver)
    DE Dave Ball (Carolina)

    Draft choices:
    1 (14) Darrelle Revis, db, Pittsburgh.
    2 (47) David Harris, lb, Michigan.
    6 (177) Jacob Bender, ot, Nicholls St.
    7 (235) Chansi Stuckey, wr, Clemson.

    Eric Mangini turned New York's roster upside down as a rookie head coach. He did it smartly last year, while facing down the pressure to make an immediate PR splash, by using the first two draft picks on offensive line. He was widely praised by the Cold, Hard Football Facts for the decisions, and the results were impressive: a six-game improvement from 2005 to 2006, a playoff berth, and an open challenge to New England's divisional supremacy.

    The offseason approach has been much different in 2007, as the Jets have done only the mildest tinkering to the roster ? they don't lose a regular starter on either side of the ball. It tells you that they like the direction the team is headed.They made some attempt to improve their mediocre defensive line (19th in the Defensive Hog Index, 24th in total run defense) with the additions of Kenyon Coleman and David Bowens. And on the offensive side of the ball, RB Thomas Jones, one of the prize offensive free agents of 2007, should start for a team that finished 30th overall in yards per attempt (3.54) last year.

    New York went defense with their only high picks, grabbing CB Darrelle Revis and LB David Harris, both of whom will at least contribute as rookies.The Jets didn't address the offensive line (22nd in the Offensive Hog Index), but figure that their two first-round rookies in 2006 (T D'Brickashaw Ferguson, C Nick Mangold) are on the rise. The Jets were dead last on the Hog Index in 2005. So here on the offensive line, as it seems everywhere else in New York under Mangini, the direction is up.

    With a lot of young talent, the Jets can expect that their intact core should take a step forward in 2007, and they've made some nice small moves to complement that group. Surpassing New England is a formidable challenge. But the Jets beat the divisional powerhouse once last year. And they only need to beat them once this year, too, to challenge for the divisional title.

    Fillability grade: A

    > http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=1431
     
  2. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with most of this, but Thomas Jones was NOT a free agent. That error makes you wonder exactly how much effort they really put into this piece.
     
  3. MParty7441

    MParty7441 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    6,251
    Likes Received:
    73
    1st thing I thought of.
     
  4. -MC-

    -MC- Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesnt say he is.
     
  5. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    That and he was EXTREMELY generous and rosy when talking about the state of the Oline. Yeah, Mangold and Brick might play better, but unless Brick can play LT, RT, and RG at the same time it won't matter much to the run game. Focusing on the defense is fine and all, but if you are evaluating the team and offseason with any kind of objectivity you would see the that right side of the O-line (hence the run game) and Oline depth are still HUGE problems. And should drop the overall grade from an A to a B/B+ IMO.
     
    #5 dabrowsk1, May 8, 2007
    Last edited: May 8, 2007
  6. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yes it does

     
  7. -MC-

    -MC- Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Woops, I read the Addition part.
     
  8. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Meh, that could just be a small blunder. Sometimes people post things that make me wonder how the hell they wrote that, but this isn't one of those.
     
  9. The Green Dude

    The Green Dude 2008 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,692
    Likes Received:
    5
    ~~~~~~~~~~~ KELLYYYYY ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I thought you were a Dolphins fan~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
  10. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who cares if he called TJones a Free Agent, we know what he ment.
    Good read. Thanks.
     
  11. JetFighter

    JetFighter Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    31
    Mostly accurate, although I think Revis and Harris will do more than "at least contribute" next year. I think they'll both play important and medium to high production roles
     
  12. Mario

    Mario Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    410
    Well adding guards via cuts is the easiest position to fill. Obviously you wont find any good Left Tackles that get cut, but you can find decent interior lineman to be stop gaps. Look at pete kendall. We picked him up a few years ago and he started for 3 seasons.
     
  13. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    It might be the easiest position to fill, but that doesn't mean it is an upgrade. Players of Kendall's calibur don't normally get cut June 1st, it was lucky, and I wouldn't count on it happening again. Stop gaps are fine but the run blocking/right side of the O-line was bad last year and they didn't address it. Clement is not that great, especially when he has to move his feet to get position on a DL to open a run gap. The FO was already shopping Kendall apparently. And Moore is average on a good day, and a penalty waiting to happen. They addressed the depth on the line a little with Bender, but who knows how he will turn out. Other then Bender whose left for depth? Wade Smith? Blanton? Doesn't exactly spur confidence. Just pray none of the OL starters get hurt.

    My point was that he was generous and not too objective when evaluating the Oline. The line and the run blocking was not addressed this offseason. So if you are going to evaluate the FO's offseason performance I think you have to take that all into account. Which IMO, would bring the grade down from an A, to a B or B+. That's all I meant.
     
    #13 dabrowsk1, May 8, 2007
    Last edited: May 8, 2007
  14. hoobash

    hoobash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,179
    Likes Received:
    48
    Not bad coming from basically a pats fan site
     
  15. -MC-

    -MC- Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats it matter? A dolphin fan cant provide us with useful Jets links?
     
  16. Green_Monster

    Green_Monster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    LOL was thinkin the same thing. :up:
     
  17. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    We have got to do something to bolster this line before the season starts. i was disappointed it was not addressed during the draft. (BTW, a 6th pick is not seriously addressing the OL.)
     
  18. The Green Dude

    The Green Dude 2008 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,692
    Likes Received:
    5
    you missed the joke :shit:
     
  19. man2man_cover

    man2man_cover New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fairly good assessment even if he classified TJ as a free agent. I'm not so sure we're all that weak on the DL or the OL like some of us in this thread seem to think.

    I think that with another year in the same system for the holdover players and the injection of the new FA signees, the DL seems to be one of the sleeper units in this forthcoming season. Hopefully Pouha can finally show us what he's got and
    couple that with the anticipated improvements with the Linebacking corp and cornerback from our top two picks and we have the look of a very promising defense.

    My only concern with the team is the recently disclosed issue with Kendall. Granted he was a positive influence and solidifying presence on the line in 2006 but I believe that an upgrade on both the guard spots is forthcoming by 2008 anyway. If fate has it that Kendall doesn't suit up for the Jets this year, picking up Andruzzi as a one-year stop gap would make a lot of sense. Looking at some of the potentially draftable guards in the college ranks this coming season, it might not be a bad idea to look towards the 2008 draft to upgrade this position.
     
  20. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    We're not only weak on the DL and OL but we're thin on depth also and undersized. There are only so many fundamental problems that can be present before one of them is likely to be a killer.

    Last year we went with a complete unknown on the DL as we moved to the 3-4, with only KVO having had any experience in the format. The result was a defense that could not stop the run for it's life. We got lucky and played mostly sad sacks the second half of the season and so we won 10 games anyway.

    This offseason we have added one part-time defensive end, one pass rush specialist (who did not play in a 3-4 on his last team) and a rookie linebacker with an injury history and somehow we expect different results. No impact moves at all on the defensive line for 2007, although Harris may eventually become a good answer at ILB. The early line says the Jets have not significantly improved their run defense for 2007 based on these moves,

    On the offensive line we just couldn't move people enough to generate any rushing attack between the tackles for most of the season last year. We're also small with LT, LG and RG all underweight by 20 lbs or more. Our RG weighs 295 lbs at a position that routinely has 330 lb drive blockers holding down the fort. We have undistinguished journeymen at RG and RT and an aging LG who is 30 lbs lighter than most of the defensive tackles he faces. Oh, and we're thin with only two backups who have played much in Wade Smith and Adrian Jones.

    Adding a premier back in Thomas Jones certainly helped, but he's not going to get any further inside than the motley selection of backs the Jets have had over the last two seasons unless the line becomes more of a force. Again, the early line says not much improvement in this critical area of the game.

    When your offensive line and defensive line are both mediocre it basically dooms your team to be so also. We have a tougher schedule this year and no realistic prospects for more than 8 wins or so. If we get a slew of injuries, like 2005, we'll be lucky to win 5 games. Just a couple of injuries could turn us into a 6 or 7 win team.
     
    #20 Br4d, May 9, 2007
    Last edited: May 9, 2007

Share This Page