Possibility of trading for the Colts' 1st rounder?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Jtuds, Apr 18, 2007.

  1. Jtuds

    Jtuds Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,641
    Likes Received:
    1
    This afternoon on NFL Radio they were talking about the Colts' draft prospects on the Afternoon Blitz. Adam Schein mentioned that the Colts don't have a 2nd rounder and may consider trading down if they can get the right deal.

    I don't have a draft value chart handy but do you think we could package our 2nd rounder and one of the players that we are willing to trade to receive their 32nd overall? They need a WR bad, so we could offer McCariens at least....I don't know who else we'd be willing to part with that would make the trade worthwhile for them. Is this at all possible?
     
    #1 Jtuds, Apr 18, 2007
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2007
  2. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not bad thinking at all, though Jmac isn't going to be enough to get a deal done. With that said, Jmac would be a very good fit for the Colts, but again, he doesn't carry much value these days.

    If someone that we really like is sitting there at 32, we have to consider our options.
     
  3. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Well the 32 pick is worth 590 on the chart and the 59+63 is worth 596. I think that's the kind of deal we might pull off if we tried really hard.

    Personally I'd rather have the 59 and 63 because I still think the Jets depth is weak.
     
  4. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with you completely, and feel that we'll get good players at 59 and 63, but if someone we passd up at 25 slips bigtime to 32, we have to at least consider it.
     
  5. Rhodes_25

    Rhodes_25 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    0
    olsen at 25 spencer at 32!
     
  6. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Or Ross at 25 and Blalock at 32. Or Blalock at 25 and Spencer at 32.

    I'd pass on Olsen. He'll likely be gone long before we pick anyway.
     
  7. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    i'd pass on olsen too...what's wrong with baker?...im sure a TE could be picked up later in the draft, not to mention we have ryan, and didnt we draft joel dreessen a couple years ago? whatever happened to him?
     
  8. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    dreessen was cut, but we also have Pociask.
     
  9. plinko

    plinko Absolute Ruler

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    6,595
    Likes Received:
    0
    so the colts have need for a receiver that can't catch?
     
  10. swifty_0

    swifty_0 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    haha soo true
     
  11. I agree.

    In fact, Unless someone big time falls into our laps at # 25, we may even trade down a few spots. The spot we are in is going to have a pretty even spectrum in terms of player value, we could certainly afford to trade down a few spots, acquire say a 4th and a 6th, and still get a player that can really help the team.
     
  12. CMartinJET

    CMartinJET New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    933
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be nice to get our 4th rounder back.
     
  13. JetsFan

    JetsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,291
    Likes Received:
    699
    59 is worth 320
    63 is worth 280
    Total of 600

    32 is worth 600

    Even trade and worth it if we really want a guy that is still there at 32.

    If we could get Olsen at 25 and then Blalock at 32 it would be worth it.
     
  14. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    I happen to think myself that we're better off with 2 second rounders. This draft's overall shallow in elite talent and it drops off after the first 20-25 players. However, the depth in actual second teir (round) level talent is pretty deep, stretching from what will be the end of round 1 through to the first few picks in round 3. Because of this, if anything, I'd rather trade down from 25 to the late 20s/early 30s and get at least a 4th rounder back, or maybe even an extra third. On top of that, we can probably still most likely grab Blalock with that pick.

    Olsen's a late second rounder at best in my book and has only been pushed up draft charts because the TE class this year is lacking elite prospects of any sort. Olsen's got all the measurables you want but lacks any production that you'd like to see from someone with that talent. That raises a major flag in my book.
     
  15. 28rogerblaze51

    28rogerblaze51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    1
    the colts need somebody who cant catch like mccareins so peyton has somebody to blame and can shake his head (trademark) for a reason.
     
  16. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Trading the 59 and the 63 for the 32 might well mean getting Justin Blalock instead of David Harris and Turk McBride or Marcus McCauley.

    While I think the OL is probably one of the areas on the team that most needs talent I also think trading two talented defensive prospects for a guard is probably a bad move at this point.

    I'm really in the trade-down and build depth camp at this point. I think the Jets are a season out from being able to really compete with an aging Pats team. I'd hate it if we got that season out and one or two injuries killed us.
     
  17. Beamen

    Beamen New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    9,902
    Likes Received:
    0
    McCareins would be a star with Peyton Manning at QB, just like every other WR who plays with Manning.
     
  18. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well . . . They lost Cato June. Throw Barton into the mix. If the rumor about Barrett is true too (and I don't want to trade him) and you have three needs for the Colts after losing their starting OLB and best CB (Nick Harper) this offseason. Package at least two of those three with our 59 and we might have the beginnings of a trade.
     
  19. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Gotta get that trade done well before the draft so the physicals can come in.
     
  20. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    McCareins will never be a star. His route-running is mediocre, he can't get separation from a good CB and his concentration breaks now and then leading him to drop gimmes at the wrong time.

    Yeah he's fast and big. My favorite plummer is 6'3" and weighs 340 pounds. That doesn't mean he ever was going to be a good lineman in the NFL.
     

Share This Page