Go WR instead of TE on day 1

Discussion in 'Draft' started by tomdeb, Mar 25, 2007.

  1. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    3,112
    I've been intruiged by some mock drafts which have the jets taking a TE in round 1--IMO that is stupid. Baker is a good TE, and we spent a 5th round pick last year on a good blocking TE. I know we need a CB, a better pass rush, and depth on the lines, but I think we should use one of our second round picks OR the third rounder on a WR. I know Coles and Cotch are great, but we got ZERO depth now behind them. I don't think JMAC will be a jet come June 2, and Brad Smith and Tim Dwight don't cut it. If Coles or Cotch tear up a knee in camp, we're looking at a long year. I am not saying trade up for a WR, but I think using one of the second rounders OR the third rounder for a WR would be wise. Forget reaching at TE.
     
  2. Pride

    Pride New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    well said. Brad Smith is a 2nd year player transitioning from Qb to Wr. Tim Dwight is an ok slot. WR has to be addressed. We escaped last year w/o major injuries. I dont like our odds again so much. Like tomdeb said, coles or cotch go down then what?
     
  3. sunnygs97

    sunnygs97 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thoroughly agree, but I think we need to use one of our top picks on Lamarr Woodley. A healthy defense is already a factor that needs addressing, whereas our WR corps is really only an issue, as tomdeb said, if Coles or Cotch goes down. I say go for a DE/OLB (Woodley), a 1st or 2nd round CB, and then address the WR situation.
     
  4. hoobash

    hoobash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,179
    Likes Received:
    48
    Wr is a postion you can get on 2nd day and still find players(like Cotchery). Unless there in love with a player I see us taking a wr on the 2nd day
     
  5. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    How bout neither? The Jets should take either a pass rusher, shutdown corner, or top tier O-lineman with 25 (and probably the next two picks too).
     
  6. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    I don't want to take a WR on the first day. We drafted Brad Smith to be a WR last year and he's shown us he has some talent. To draft ANOTHER just because Brad Smith isn't yet ready is stupid. As a rookie, it's unlikely he would be a better option than Brad SMith anyway. I know our depth is a concern, but we ARE building it, we've just got to give it time.
     
  7. Big Poppa Naich

    Big Poppa Naich Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,816
    Likes Received:
    2
    You do NOT spend a first round pick on a guy who is going to be a 3rd WR. However, I could see a 2nd round or 3rd round pick. That is fine.
     
  8. SigmaXJet

    SigmaXJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    2
    Those mocks have the Jets taking a TE because Greg Olsen would be the BPA not because the Jets depersately need a TE. Olsen could also lineup as a slot WR so really he would upgrading two positions on offense and allowing the Jets to be more creative
     
  9. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    he's a downgrade to baker though...i really don't understand why people think he's going to improve this team (let alone even play)...he did NOTHING at miami, nothing...why would that warrant a first round pick? i just don't get it
     
  10. SigmaXJet

    SigmaXJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    2
    because you draft a player on potential and ability, not on their COLLEGE stats with horrible QB play
     
  11. FOURTHANDLONG

    FOURTHANDLONG Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    2
    If that is the case then Brad Smith should have a shot to play with his potential and ability and we should concentrate on the O-line and Defense. He has the potential and ability to play if given a fair chance. Did they even throw a pass down the field to him last year?
     
  12. Warhound7

    Warhound7 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    820
    Likes Received:
    0
    exactly. i agree depth at WR is an issue but its not as big of an issue as key players on defense and depth at certain defensive spots. cut smith some slack and dwight is getting old but again, they're both reliable. if we went WR on day, as we're proving in the mock draft on these boards, there are plenty of good day 2 WRs out there -- Rhema McKnight, Yamon Figurs just to name 2.
     
  13. xjets2002x

    xjets2002x Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,814
    Likes Received:
    17
    I'd really prefer a corner or a quality front seven guy with that first pick. I'm not sold on Olsen either, and I don't really believe in first round tight ends. I don't think he's the type of tight end they're looking for.

    -X-
     
  14. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    WR is the least or our worries as is TE...1st day should be spent on CB, OL, and OLB...nothing else unless someone ridiculous is available. Maybe I'd be ok with using our 3rd rounder on a WR/TE, but not anything higher considering our NEEDS right now.
     
  15. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    3,112
    makes a lot of sense
     
  16. redneckjet

    redneckjet New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    0
    I say let's keep working on the lines....Get strong on BOTH sides of the ball....fill in the superstars with second rounders.....you win in the trenches
     
  17. TheCoolerGlennFoley

    TheCoolerGlennFoley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    32
    I think if available you go Revis in the 1st, Woodley/Moses with 2a, offensive guard at 2b and then potentially a receiver or tight end in the 3rd.
     

Share This Page