donnie....furrey is alright, but there are more talented wr's available IMO.....and when you used Cotchery as your argument, that is flawed IMO.....if furrey was in our offense, do you think he would have put up better numbers than cotchery....in our "dink n dunk" offense?? JC would have done just as good or better than Furrey this year on the Lions because he is more taleneted, not to mention this is his first year starting....Cotchery has solid #1 potential as well, and I don't think you can say that about Furrey
it was gross or hope for me, he went the pick after i picked. I wanted gros for a couple of rounds and just wanted to snag him
why is it i can never get to a computer and get passed over but spend most of the time waiting on these people? haha.
I originally thought we should of stuck things out and get 32 people doing this draft,thank we didn't do that.Imagine how slow it would be going if we had 32 people.
I did a fantasy draft last year with 32 teams and I took Barnes with my 3rd round pick,he apparently has a very promising future albeit I have no idea how he did last year.
I like the pace this draft is going at, and you guys are right in saying that 32 would be hell (that's why I cut it off at 20). I was originally debating whether 16 or 20 would be better for a draft, but with half of the actual teams, we'd only see the top half of talent in the league get drafted. We seem to move very well during the week, and we just struggle to get picks in on the weekends. If that pace continues we could always try 4 hrs. on weekdays and 8 hrs. on Friday, Saturday, Sunday.
UPDATE Minor thing, but for my updating convinience, the first 9 rounds have been moved to post 11 or 12 (I don't remember) in the picks thread, and rounds 10-? will be listed in the first post. So you can still CTRL+F and it'll all be on the same page.
