Two 100 Yard Rushers for Jets tomorrow?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by billo83, Dec 30, 2006.

  1. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oh great now the raiders have a good pass D because Woodson said so and some idiot on ESPN said so as well. Just because they said it its true. Don't beleive everything you here. The only reason your pass D looks good is because teams run all over your shitty run defense. Therefore they don't need to pass.
     
  2. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0

    Just keep talking BIG. I remember you were saying the same thing before facing the Bills. What happened my memory a liitle foggy. I think Bills gave you a beating.
     
  3. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Word to the wise.

    Shut up, Raiderjoey. If by some chance the Raiders win tomorrow, then you can talk all the trash you want. All you are doing tonight is giving me more stuff to use against you if the Jets win.
     
  4. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0

    Our Defense has let up the fewest points in the league since the break and our Run Defense has been great since then as well. Our Rb's do not suck their young players who are developing and are gonna be a very good 1-2 punch.
     
  5. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0

    The Bills are a waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy better team then you guys theres a diffrence when your playing a divisional opponent who still has playoff hopes than the worst team in the league who just wants to end the season. So now go crawl back into your hole and jerkoff to the heights, weights and 40 times of all the pathetic players the raiders have.
     
  6. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I'm going to have a guy as ridiculous as you calling me "challenged?" Wow. Amazing shit.

    You'll be messed with ad nauseum by me in the New Year so long as I don't get banned. Prepare yourself, Jethro.


    My post was very, very simple. The Raiders are averaging 135.1 yards against on the ground. Therefore, it is within reason that the Jets would gain significant yardage on the ground tomorrow. Sorry you could not grasp what I was implying.
     
  7. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0


    You gave me enough stuff that you better hope Jets win tommorrow. Do me a favor keep talking. Only going to hurt so much more.
     
  8. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you guys by some luck and I mean luck because luck because its the only thing thats gonna keep your sorry asses in the game win tommorow. Talk all the shit you want and i'll eat all the crow there is. But I dont think i'll have to worry about that.
     
  9. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    NO Im know what you were implying and I showed you in the example. (Very basic) Where your thinking was messed up. You don't have to be a math major to figure out my point.
     
  10. NJRaider

    NJRaider New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    0
    I quoted experts, no matter what you may think of them, to show that I'm not just a biased fan popping off. Maybe you're not used to that around here.

    I guess your word trumps theirs.
     
  11. NJRaider

    NJRaider New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was just kidding about 72 turnovers. I've watched every game and it looks that way to me!
     
  12. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    You have it all wrong. My point was as simple as it gets.

    I know what the numbers are. The Raiders are allowing 4.0 yards per carry. I am aware of where that puts them in that specific ranking.

    That doesn't matter. Was not was I was posting about.


    For the third time now, the Raiders are allowing 135.1 yards on the ground per game.

    It is reasonable to think the Jets will gain significant yardage on the ground tomorrow.

    We have been talking about this Raiders-Jets game since last year's Raiders-Jets game. You embarrassed yourself by guaranteeing the Raiders would win the game last year. What's it going to be tomorrow? "The Raiders will be 11-5 next year. The Jets will go 6-10. Let's see what you have to say when the Raiders beat the Jets in 2008." You are ridiculous.
     
  13. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    maybe with jerald sowell paving the way...i'll take one, even a combined 170+ rushing yards
     
  14. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes And I remember when you laughed when I talked up raiders young defense.
    also sometimes moves(trades) do make your team a better team. Case IN Point. P Buchanon was suppose to be a shutdown cb when raiders drafted him. IT didn't work out but by moving him they were able to get the CB (f washington) and Kirk morrison that improved the defense tremendously.
    Lets see, what they replace L Jordan and R Moss with.
     
  15. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,354
    Likes Received:
    25,581
    2-13, jeaux.
     
  16. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    You write the same crap all the time.

    The Raiders suck right now. Big time. Take it like a man like I did last year when the Jets sucked.
     
  17. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    5,138
    big difference between the Bills and Bay Area Butt Pirates
     
  18. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    5,138
    we didnt even suck as bad as they do:rofl2:
     
  19. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0

    Are you kiddin me as a Jet fan im used to biased stuff all the time. I had to watch the whole MNF game listen to Tony Kornshitter and Joe Trashman bash Chad. He prove both of those motherf*ckers wrong. Every week we have to watch Sean Salisfagget pick against us. Dont you ever tell any Jets fan that were not used to having people being biased towards us.
     
  20. billo83

    billo83 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey I'm greedy LOL!! Maybe I shouldn't have said good chance, but a reasonable possibilty - I did put a ? at the end of the title!. A couple of my caveats were: 1.) The Jets would be firing on all cylinders and 2.) Leon would break a long gainer 60+.

    IF these caveats come true then:

    1.) The Raiders will be cooked by halftime.
    2.) We run almost the entire 2nd half. This gives Cedric 25 carries plus and if you go by stats, easily gives him 100 plus yards.
    3.) Leon breaks a 60 plus yarder. Then he only needs another 40 yards for his 100.

    IMO if the Jets ARE firing on all cylinders (as they should be with the playoffs on the line) then the Raiders will pack it in by halftime. Then the Jets will run the ball the rest of the day on a poor run defense that has New Years Eve on their minds. This opens up the possibilty of Leon breaking a long one, or a couple say 20-30 yarders which will get him in the neighborhood of 100.

    I'm not saying it's probable but a reasonable possibility given the caveats. I don't think anyone would argue that the Jets should get 150+ yards on this D and I'm just expanding a little bit for debate. Hey at the very least it got the Raidergirls fans panties in a wad - that makes it much sweeter!
     

Share This Page