Possible Roster of Offense w/Watson vs Without

What are you even talking about? Lol Jets aren’t taking Sewell to play guard and it makes 0 sense to take him when they have Becton.

 

He was recruited to potentially be a guard because of his size despite playing tackle in high school. He replaced Tyrell Crosby, their starting tackle.

This video is from his junior year in high school at tackle. You affirmed that he has played guard before. I stated that he had not unless it was as a sophomore in high school, which would be rather irrelevant at this point after four straight years at tackle - two at the collegiate level.
https://247sports.com/Video/2016-Junior-Year-7455667/
https://247sports.com/Video/Penei-S...st-true-frosh-to-start-along-Oregons-8627757/

You should do some more research before making yourself look like a fool and taking a recruiting note without context from a draft site.

 

Oh cool. So you didn't read or watch anything I sent.

He projected as a guard. But he played tackle as a junior and senior in high school. He was immediately moved to tackle upon his arrival at Oregon. Not sure what you don't understand. The most recent game action he could've had at guard was in 2015 as a sophomore in high school and I can't even confirm that.

 

That's like the OP in this thread. Completely pointless to read.

 

I like option 2 for sure. But where is Ty Johnson? I think he is the type of running back they want in this offense. Also, why is Sewell an LT . That is way too much to waste him as a backup to Becton. I would rather trade out and take Kyle Pitts and load up some more offense that could help Darnold.

 

Kinda been Jet's draft strategy for the last 10 years. Taking defensive ends and tackles. Yeah, that sure didn't work out.

 

That Watson offense would beat the Darnold offense 63-20