they already signed haskins. if we move on form darnold the most likely places are indy, SF, washington, broncos, and chi
Or their hall of fame QB isn't retiring and they feel no need to give up a 2nd round pick for a backup. So yeah, I guess they prefer Haskins.
Not necessarily. Haskins won't cost them anything except the cost of a futures contract. Sam would cost them probably a 2nd and a 5th or a 3rd and a 5th.
hope it's just talk. no me gusta another qb needsa be on this roster when sam gets hurt again and sucks some more
Why the heck are you up this early? I thought I was the only one waking up at 4 am regularly? Same for you mister Matt. Why up so early?
my sleepcycle has been destroyed by the election runup, the election its grisly aftermath, georgia runoffs and our QB problem and HC search... am on PST? otfen getting only 4 or 5 hrs a night...
I believe they will give Sam a shot with the new scheme, I understand it’s not the most popular idea, and I have no issues with Jets moving on from Sam, however I do think he gets one more shot.
sadly, i thnk there is a decent chance. am like a betan dohg who cant trust. i feel the same vague nausea that we'll take the damned ol @ #2
sadly, i thnk there is a decent chance. am like a betan dohg who canyt trust. i feel the same vague nausea that we'll take the damned ol @ #2
So the Jets are going to keep Sam Darnold in a heavy play action offense? Doesn't make sense to me. Both the 49ers and Packers are of the top teams in the league in play action usage and the Jets have a QB that is terrible at using play action.
