Ramifications of the Ohio State vs. Clemson game

Discussion in 'Draft' started by BudJet, Jan 2, 2021.

  1. Poeman

    Poeman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    14,530
    Likes Received:
    8,336
    Then get ready for Sunshine
     
  2. NYJFOREVER

    NYJFOREVER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    7,991
    Likes Received:
    9,025
    Absolutely.

    If I had to rank them it’d be Daboll, Campbell, and Smith.
     
    FJF and NCJetsfan like this.
  3. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    12,462
    1000% on point. Well said.
     
  4. Catfish Billy

    Catfish Billy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    1,331
    they already had 21 pts and driving before they kicked out Skalski. Also, Fields stopped scrambling after that hit. So we didn’t even get the full Arsenal from him either
     
  5. Catfish Billy

    Catfish Billy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    1,331
    there is so much wrong in this post
     
  6. papapump

    papapump Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    1,524
    Lots of draft capital.
     
    ouchy likes this.
  7. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    This is a strong argument for taking superstars at other positions at 2 and taking sniping shots at QB's later in the 1st round when the value spent is significantly less.

    If you're going to fail 65-75% of the time no matter what you do it is better to do that on the 14 or the 26 than on the 2.
     
    b.reyes16 likes this.
  8. Cromartie's_kid

    Cromartie's_kid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    605
    what’s your rationale/thinking related to why a trade would come that soon. I feel like they tip their hand if they move darnold that soon and feel like they would f themselves royally if they moved the two and then somehow Trevor is available. I feel like the pick gets traded when they are on the clock if at all. Curious as to your thoughts.
     
  9. JetsKickAss

    JetsKickAss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,561
    Likes Received:
    1,627
    I think you trade Darnold if you are drafting a QB.

    If you are not drafting a QB and not taking a player at #2, then Darnold is staying.
     
    patleahy likes this.
  10. patleahy

    patleahy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2020
    Messages:
    1,947
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    I agree JetsKickAss.
     
    JetsKickAss likes this.
  11. Borat

    Borat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2018
    Messages:
    5,251
    Likes Received:
    8,662
    As bad as that Rams win was for the Jets fans (followed by Browns to seal the loss of #1 pick), this game has undone a lot of the damage caused by losing #1 pick. This game gives a real hope again in drafting a legit franchise QB following this terrible year of the tank, something that was taken away a week ago. Comparisons of Fields to Sam Darnold or Sanchez who had one good Bowl game too back in the day are simply not valid. Both of them had only one good year in College. Sam actually regressed in his jr season. None of them could even sniff Fields completion percentage this year of 73+%, TD/TO ratio, level of competition, or have anywhere near his dual threat QB ability, or multiple seasons of high level play. Add to that the fact Fields has had amazing success in HS as well and was a top recruit, which shows the guy has been dominant against top competition for a long time now.

    In this game Fields just reminded us about the player he has been all along, if you look at his entire body of work, which came into doubt last few weeks after a pair of subpar performances, thinking he may have regressed. He didn't, and he basically restored what people have been saying for a while earlier, it's Lawrence QB1 and Fields QB1A, both rare elite prospects. We now can get top QB talent, and this is extremely exciting again. The talk about "value" of Jets pick going up is irrelevant. The value is being able to get an elite level QB with our #2 pick. Now, let's just hope both declare.
     
  12. AJW

    AJW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    532
    Relax.

    Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
     
    FJF likes this.
  13. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I'm not sure trading Darnold makes sense at this point unless we get a trading partner making a strong offer for him - on the order of a late 1st round pick in 2021 or an unknown 1st in 2022.

    My argument would be that even if the Jets draft a QB it makes sense to keep Darnold around until late in camp to see how things develop. It's easy to get a 1st round QB to sign their deal and get into camp if the Jets have Darnold already signed for the year, which he is, and reporting to camp on time. Darnold is also rookie yips protection, allowing the Jets to give the rookie a chance to get his feet on the ground.

    Also the market for Darnold is likely to be better in camp than it is around the draft. Teams are unlikely to make a strong offer for him before the draft has concluded. There are too many unknowns for them as their draft progresses. After the draft things will settle down some and it is possible somebody will conclude that Darnold is worth offering a 2022 1st for at that point. However in camp people will get injured and disappoint - it happens every year. That's when the market for Darnold might really heat up as one or more teams decides he is their best option for the year.

    It's even possible the Jets will decide that is the case and hold onto him until they have a better grip on what the team looks like next year.
     
  14. JetsKickAss

    JetsKickAss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,561
    Likes Received:
    1,627
    As I recall, Sanchez was forecasted to go anywhere from low-single digits to 15th ?
     
    zace and Br4d like this.
  15. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    I agree
     
  16. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    I don't think Sam gets traded while the Jets are on the clock. There's not enough time to work out a deal. So if JD is trading Sam I believe it will happen before the draft, so the other team knows that they don't have to try to draft a QB, and can adjust their draft plans accordingly. I suppose JD could work out a deal in principal with a team prior to the draft that if they don't get the QB they want, they will pull the trigger on the trade, but I think JD would only do that if only one team is interested in Darnold, and their interest is iffy.

    JD will have a plan well before the draft. I think it is most likely that he will move on from Sam and look to sign a vet FA QB like Tyrod Taylor. If he indeed decides to move on from Sam, I think Sam will be traded prior to the draft, and ideally after FA. That way if JD is unable to sign Taylor or whatever vet FA QB he wants, he could hold onto Sam as insurance.

    IMO there's no real point in bringing Sam back unless the Jets plan to make a long-term commitment to Sam, and I just can't see JD and the HC basing their career on Sam. With a new HC & OC, and thus a new offense, it makes sense to move on from Sam. They will be busy installing the new offense and won't have time to work on fixing Sam. They need a vet like Taylor that either already knows the basic system due to his experience with a number of teams or can pick it up quickly, so whatever time and energy they need to spend helping develop a QB will be with the rookie and Morgan since they are the future. Sam is the past. Taylor would be the perfect QB because he is a mobile QB who also runs, and the changes in the offense from Taylor to Fields would probably be minimal.
     
    #136 NCJetsfan, Jan 3, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2021
  17. Jets4eva9011

    Jets4eva9011 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    818
    Lmaooooo. Are you SURE you've been watching Justin Fields and not another QB?? o_O

    Thanks for the laugh, though. Almost made me spit out my water.
     
    #137 Jets4eva9011, Jan 3, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2021
    Freddy Mondo likes this.
  18. KWJetsFan

    KWJetsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,037
    Likes Received:
    4,559
    Did I sound stressed or something? If anything, I'm resigned.
     
  19. zace

    zace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    7,430
    Likes Received:
    2,809
    Oh explain!!!! Because there isnt.

    Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
     
  20. zace

    zace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    7,430
    Likes Received:
    2,809
    Yeah ive been. Im not impressed as easily as you i guess. Hes not an an NFL QB, period. Remember when people actually wanted Geno Smith? Thats the problem with this franchise and fans, you always settle for someone who sucks. Sanchez, Smith, Darnold, Clemens, Sims, McElroy the list goes on of QBs with "potential".

    Fields isnt a game changer.

    Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page