I laugh at all these Teddy threads. The odds are way more that he never sees a snap in a Jets uniform than these fantasies,
I don't even have an opinion on your original post because you left out one massive factor: he's on a one year deal. If he plays as well as you think he is, he's not coming back to be a backup for backup money, he's going to be a starter somewhere for starter money. Again though, that was talked about in three other threads. On that note, thank you to whoever merged them all.
Yes thank you moderator for getting me off the hook. I guess your right if he’s good he’s gone. Still rather see him in 2018 then mccown
Keep Teddy alive and healthy..McCown retirement bound any day now OMG ..if Teddy was gone we would have Sackenberg backing up our Trojan...great plan (not)
I disagree on all accounts. If you know anything about Teddy, his talent and play at Louisville, he has the talent to have a 4,000 yard season. It's not his fault that he was asked to be a game manager in Minnesota. You don't re-sign a player just because you're afraid he could get injured again? It is a concern, but if he has that kind of season, you don't just cast him aside for an unproven rookie, no matter how talented the rookie is. How stupid would Mac look if he traded Teddy for a 2nd or 3rd round pick, Teddy continued to light it up for his new team for the next 10 years, and Darnold turns out to be a bust (God forbid!) or just an average NFL QB? IMO you re-sign Teddy, ride him as long as you can, until his play falls off, he gets re-injured, or Darnold looks a lot better in practice/TC.
Spot on!!! Some people don't stop and think before they post. They just have knee-jerk reactions. If Teddy had that kind of season and Mac just let him walk or traded him for a 2nd or 3rd round pick, rather than re-signing Teddy (or at least trying), he should be lined up against a wall and shot.
He most certainly was. For you to make that statement shows that you have no clue what "more pro ready" means. Teddy had a lot more playing experience, didn't have fundamental issues to work on, and had played in an NFL-style offense. Being more "pro ready" has nothing to do with ceiling or how big one is or how talented one is. It's all about being ready to start day one in the NFL.
Four posts in a row and you can't even explain why Teddy is more pro ready at a remedial level. You made a bunch of vague references to stats, and that's as close as you come. Maybe if you post 12 paragraphs of the same stuff, you'll fool more people. And yes, I know you will report my post. I'm getting used to that action. You're itching a scratch at this point. I'm either your life coach or your worst enemy at this point. But I guess that's up to you.
Everyone want to rewrite Teddys college career. His next to last season he looked like the overall number 1 pick in the entire draft. His last season he fell big time in people's minds and then he had a disasterous combine and was called a da two pick. Minny moved up into the last spot of the first and nabbed him. He had a slow motion and a hitch. He was free falling, Clearly his readiness to play in the NFL wasn't a given..
He really misunderstands what “pro ready” means. Not more talented, not a higher ceiling, not a better prospect. Lol.
Teddy fell because teams thought he wasn't durable enough due to frame and he had a pretty shitty pro day
Didn't Christian Hackenberg play in a pro style offense his freshman year with Bill O'Brien as his head coach? Playing in a pro style offense certainly helps a college quarterback make the transition to the NFL, but it doesn't mean one can start in the NFL or they're more ready.
