Langford did the same for them and is barely in the NFL now. rawls did a great job in seattle and same for him. both are on our roster and might not make it. I need to see more of howard to annoint him anything. he had nice stats due to volume but hard to say he's had a major impact on a team that ddin't win anything
Howard has 2 strong seasons of production. Langford didn't bring that to the table. Rawls can't stay healthy and has awful vision. Howard is there to stay.
I like howard, i'm just saying he isn't in the same category as gurley, zeke, fournette, hunt, bell, johnson etc. he's a solid starting RB in the NFL but he isn't a "top 10" guy
I'd say he's on the cusp ... he needs to get better in terms of catching the ball, but hes a rising star IMO ... with Allen Robinson and a better offensive, he might put up career #s
I like trubisky personally, but don't see him as good of a prospect as rosen or darnold is for this year. He's going to have a rough career in chicago though
haha..I saw one mock draft today and we all know about them but in this one the Jets pass on Rosen and take Allen. Buffalo trades up to 4 and takes Rosen..can you imagine??????
def not better then Darnold or Rosen, not even close IMO ... hes very similar to Mark Sanchez in terms of skill-sets. He might be what Mark could have been as Trubisky will get good coaching and having Allen Robinson and Jordan Howard - 2 pro bowlers is huge. Matt Nagy is gonna turn heads over there. That Andy Reid coaching tree is special.
Darnold needs time. He’s a gamer that can make plays no doubt. I have 3 major concerns however, he is pretty sloppy when the play breaks down, he wasn’t under center much and he’s only 20 and needs to sit at least a year.
Do you really think it will take 203 years to find out is Mayfield is a bust? I guess we only have 201 years left for Hack to improve......
