you forgot one important thing: Women are separated from Men by their crippling inability to judge and perceive spacial size and depth. "depth perception" if you will. Some doctors will tell you its a natural misfire in their brain from birth. But I think its developed over time from being lied to their whole lives about what exactly "6 inches" is....
You can continue to find support from your pedophile buddies who will justify your predilection to fuck children, but it ain't the rest of the world that's crazy because it sees you're the one with the problem just because your buddies tell you there's nothing wrong with fucking children.
So because Holly Mangold exists it means every, or at least the majority, of women are capable of the same feats? She's not an exception but the rule? Therefore the gender constructs differentiating men and women in regards to athletic feats is incorrect?
I'd like to think it would speak favorably to one's leadership qualities to speak out against violent mobs trying to silence political speech.
I really hate how most of those protesters are my age (18-30) Its also kind of scary how most young people in the US are totally OK with people who do hate speech should be arrested. People should be allowed to be racist and express it in public, thats why we have the 1st amendment.
It's all organized George Soros moveon.org, BLM, bernie bro, occupy wallstreet bullshit. Maybe it's just my perception but they seem to be getting stronger, more organized and more violent as a group. Things could get ugly really quickly.
in all honesty if they burn Cleveland down will anyone notice it to be different? I mean thats almost like doing a public service
You seem a little obsessed with fuckin children Jet "Hastert" Blew. Way to prove that you're not crazy
And of course it says nothing about you, correct, that when you think of my user name you can't stop thinking of "blowing" when you see "blue." Like gender and sex, the two are not interchangeable, but in your typical fashion you will ignore those facts. Seems you fantasize a bit much about me. Sadly I'm too old for you. Your pedophile buddies would not approve.
Most men aren't capable of those feats either. Think about it. All female distance runners are better at distance running than 99.99% of all men, not including male distance runners. The differences between men and women at the margins may be large but the difference between women at the margins and all men are not, and in fact those women are superior to almost all men at those tasks. In a true sexually dimorphic situation the sexes are differentiated so much that one sex usually cannot compete with any individuals of the opposite sex. Our society assigns roles and then reinforces them at every opportunity. The navy did a study in the 60's that suggested that women would make better submarine crews than men. They would be better adapted to living in tight quarters and they would use fewer resources in the process. All crews are of course still all male. Because that's the role society assigns men. Even if there's no clear reason and there's lots of evidence that women would be better at the role.
And you're a dude. Maybe you're ok with thinking about me inside you but that's not my bag. You're in your mid thirties. You should start accepting yourself for who you are; a man that likes showering at the ymca with men and boys.
You're still talking about physical exceptions when discussing narrow and specific activities. The discussion only has value when looking at the sexes broadly. It's one of the basic tenets of logic -- the more narrow your position the less logical it is. The broader your argument is and it can still be applied the more logical it is.
Clearly it is your bag, you brought it up. This is what's great about you; you're too fucking stupid to realize you just commited the very same behavior you accused me of just a post ago of yours. If you bring it up its your obsession. Those are the rules you established with you bullshit. Well done. Now go back to thinking about me and how you "blew" is what comes to your mind when you do.
When you look at the sexes broadly virtually any woman who is in shape and of above average size is better adapted to physical tasks than most men. It's when we get into highly adapted males, like athletes, soldiers who have been through rigorous training, etc, that the differences begin to really emerge. When you then incorporate women athletes, soldiers who have been through rigorous training, etc, the differences begin to slip away again. If you raise somebody to be gentle and non-aggressive and you push them into less substantial clothing and you don't make them do chores that require significant strength and all of that you will produce a physically weaker, less decisive and confrontational individual. That's what we do with the majority of females. We encourage them to watch their weight instead of accumulating muscle mass. We encourage them to engage in passive pursuits instead of the active pursuits we push boys into. The physiological differences between men and women are real but they are not limiting for the vast majority of everyday occupations that people do. Try telling that to somebody who has the preconceived notion, reinforced at every step by society, that men and women are vastly different in their capabilities and the response you'll likely see is the one you have been giving step by step.
