The implication is that women can't do things that men can do, which for the most part is not true. However in the normal course of life women have restrictions based on their role in procreation that men do not share. Holly Mangold can lift more weight than 99.99% of the men on earth. There is a Chinese female lifter who is able to lift as much as all but a handful of male competitors. When you get to that point the role of sexual dimorphism in human beings has begun to approach the melding point. However either of those two individuals will have moments in their life where their biology places demands on them that no male will have to endure and so their needs are different. This despite the fact that they are indistinguishable for the most part in terms of strength with almost everybody in the 100th percentile, out of billions of people. Holly Mangold does a routine when she competes where she comes on stage and does a running cartwheel with a perfect graceful landing. 99.99% of people her weight can't even run.
Are you arguing Holly Mangold is an exception or isn't an exception, and all women are capable of achieving her level of strength and agility but and merely constrained by the role they play in reproduction?
I feel the same thing about jet blew. They are basically a caricature of everything that all dems, most moderates and some republicans hate about the Republican Party.
Haha. You scurry away at the sight a logical and sound argument like the light coming on, only to reappear in the dark with more stupidity.
As soon as I hear a sound and/or logical argument from you I'll be sure to mark the date on the calendar bc it will be a very special day.
You wouldn't know one when you saw it. You've never made one rational and sound post in any topic I've ever seen you chime in with your typical liberal appeals to emotion bullshit.
What does rational sound like to a crazy person? If I ever start to sound rational to you please warn me so I can check myself into a nut house.
I'm arguing that Holly Mangold is stronger and more fit to do strength related tasks than most men who work jobs that require strength. Once you get to that point what exactly is it that separates her (and by extension the female gender) from the male gender? The answer is that at some point if she chooses to procreate she is likely to effectively be ill from the process for months and then have an infant very dependent on her for months afterwards. Men aren't hindered by procreation in that way. There are a few other differences that show up over time, primarily related to the way society views men and women (how many men wear crippling devices on their feet for social effect? How many women are allowed to remove their top in public when they get overheated from exertion, etc?) But basically there are no differences between men and women that effect the ability to do virtually any job in society at this point, except when procreation is involved in the equation.
