Oh and dont mention RT one more time without mentioning the fact that the audience score is 74. So hurts your source as reliable. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
It doesn't matter what Rotten Tomatoes or any site says. All that matters is what you feel. You like it, so that is your taste. How I feel: It was a disgrace to some of the best characters ever created. It let down some pretty good actors. It was a complete mess. 4 movies in 1. The old if you have more than 1 quarterback, you have none theory. And it has 4. Batman movie, Superman Movie, Batman vs Superman Movie, and Justice League movie. None done very well either. It also makes no sense character wise. Why does Lex not like Superman or Batman? Why is he doing this? It makes no sense. How the Batman vs. Superman fight ends REALLY makes no sense and is not how Batman would handle anything. Makes him look like a moron. He wasted all that time for nothing? The final battle was a complete mess and waste of time. Should not have been in the movie. What happens in the end, another complete waste of time. It will be resolved quickly. Let's talk POSITIVES from this Movie: 1. Ben Affleck was okay as Batman. Could have been much worse. Not close to Bale or Keaton, but not awful either. 2. Superman comes out as the more heroic and likeable character. There were some cool moments for him. 3. Wonder Woman has a bright future. Good in this, but barely in it. 4. Justice League has potential too, if Zack Snyder gets booted from the project. Otherwise: more crap on the way. 5. The Bat Cave looked cool. 6. Jeremy Irons as Alfred was pretty good. Again, barely used. So you can see from those positives that a good movie was possible. Potential films down the line have a chance to be good. As for Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice: I give it a D.
Its not about whether he liked it or not. Its the way he talks to others who disagree. You said you didnt like it and you didnt see me jumping down your throat. Youre allowed to feel how you feel about a movie. The reason i like it iss the same reason i prefer DC to marvel, its dark. Its everything that makes DC what it is now, which is funny because they got this way trying to imitate marvel. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Haha nice. I too am more of a DC Comics fan than Marvel (Mostly Batman) but film wise, Marvel has blown DC out of the water. You have a great Christopher Nolan trilogy, but besides that: Not much. Man of Steel sucked, Green Lantern sucked, BvS sucks. X-Men movies: X-Men and X-2 are good. X-3 sucked. X-Men Origins Wolverine sucked, but First Class, Days of Future Past and Hopefully Apocalypse are great. The Wolverine was alright. So pretty good track record. Marvel movies: all have been good. Maybe Ed Norton's Incredible Hulk sucked, but they scrapped that pretty quick. I saw posts like this: That is a little much for me. Those are some of the, weaker yet still pretty good, Marvel movies and are all far superior to BvS. If you Pro-Batman v. Superman fans just want to say "I love Batman. I love Superman. Seeing them on screen at all is awesome to me. Don't care about the story or editing or directing at all. I just love those characters no matter what, thus I enjoyed BvS." I could believe that. That's about it though.
Its a mix of new 52 + frank miller + worlds finest. All of which i like. Lets face batman is the type of paranoid freak to do something like that. Have you read tower of babel? He did have secret plans to kill all the JL league members should they go rogue. They did kick him out afterwards. The movie is about as close to batman as hes been on the big screen. Henry Cavill was the weak link if you ask me. Hes not bad, just not exciting. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
If you had any semblance of intelligence you'd have noticed I already addressed the 74% score which is actually low for this type of movie. Not to mention it disputes your dumbfuck argument that people with negative opinions are more likely to voice their displeasure than those who like it. 3 times as many people are voicing their like for it than dislike, but the ratio is still low for this type of movie. You aren't even smart enough to see the wall you walked right into, and you keep pushing forward into it like some dumb ass thinking it may not be there the next time. But you aren't the Kool Aid man.
Youre late and took you a while to come up with a response. You never addressed it. All you kept saying was RT has a score of 31. Dont come to me hours later and try and sound like you been on the ball. Youre an idiot you can kiss my ass and you can keep it moving. You failed to accurately address the disparity between scores which undermines your argument. Like i said all you do is try and obfuscate the fact that you have no valid argument by tying insults in, only problem is you picked the wrong asshole to argue with because im so much of a dick i have no feelings. So please next time you address my post make sure you reply in a timely fashion and on topic. Thank you and have a good night. Sincerely Zace the fucker. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Saw Batman vs Superman last night. I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it! Going in with low expectations probably helped. The musical score was one thing that really caught my attention randomly. I felt like it was well done from that aspect. The dream sequences and slight disjointedness could be confusing though. Affleck as Batman was surprisingly good as well. The whole thing had a very dark feel to it, but a different sort to the Bale Batmans.
comprehension isn't your strong suit: The Official DC Comics Film Universe Thread I'm sorry you spent all day sitting by your computer screen waiting for a reply. you should try having a life outside of Batman and Superman, that way you won't only not wrap your Saturday's around an internet argument but you also wouldn't make your personal identity so dependent on being a Batman and Superman fan that you can't simply accept some people don't like the film and have to say they don't understand it so you can feel better about yourself. it truly takes a special kind of insecurity to do so. you see, if you had any semblance of intelligence you'd realize I never said I liked or disliked the film, or criticized your like of the film. I criticized you for your desperation for self-validation by a Batman and Superman movie that would would personalize any criticism of it to an extent that you would have to criticize people who didn't like it. The discussion has nothing to do with the movie and has to do with you. but, because you clearly have your own identity wrapped up in being a fan of these characters, any criticism of the movie is an attack on you, and so you counter attack with ad hominems. that's pretty sad. that's sad for you, but pretty funny for the rest of us to laugh at. not as funny as the fact that you were apparently so scarred by the Force Awakens discussion that you actually remember it. I know I participated in that discussion, but with who? not a clue. wasn't important to me. but you apparently took it very personal, whereas I simply moved on with my life. but, that would be par for the course for someone like you who waits around his computer with desperation for a reply and the difference between someone like you with such desperation and other, normal people, whose days and lives don't revolve around these properties or arguments around them. I think you need to accept that nobody gives a fuck about your stupid comics that your life and identity are wrapped around. This movie wasn't made for comic book losers like you. a top selling comic nowadays sells about 60,000 units per month. this movie is going to sell about 8.5 million tickets this weekend alone. you comic nerds with your childlike understanding of story and characters that are executed in comics are not the audience for this movie. you're an irrelevant market segment for this movie. your 60,000 tickets you would bring to the box office means nothing. this movie is for everybody else who remembers the characters and enjoys watching movies based around them. Those people matter, and they aren't liking this movie very much, relative to the genre. what hurts more, that they don't like it or that you don't matter?
Dude youre still going. You a idiot plain and simple.you dont know me, you don't k ow anything about me, so don't pretend to. Don't pretend to be smart you are not. Im glad it took you hours to think of a response, but youre a fay late and a dollar short. You dont address any valid point, again you try and obsure the fact that there were holes in your argument as to why the movie was bad and how anyone who likes it is beneath you. Thats your problem not mine. Notice how i timely responsed to your argument? Now lets address the stupidity of your argument. You stated 74 percent score for the audience is low...... Out of 100??? How the fuck does that even make sense? Thats more than half. Lets compare the good dinosaur which has an RT score of 67 with the audience and for reference point, well also use spectre and creed with scores of 63 and 91 respectively. So by your argument BvS audience score is bad and so are spectre anf the good dinosaur? Are they bad movies too? The audience score for TGD is lower than the critic score, so whos correct? I don't think anyone on here would say creed is a bad movie by any stretch, but if i recall there were people on here who didnt like it thatuch too. So are they wrong? Stay with me here. How can you make the argument of a movies worth based off of review scores? You cant theyre terribly inconsistent. Problem is youre like a 15 yr old, you think youre smarter than you really are. Now i dont know you personally and i was respectful in the star wars thread but you dont seem to learn, so you will get none from me. The next time you want to use RT scores in an argument, better review the sote and other releases beforehand. Im not debating insecurities or any nonsense like that because if you knew anything about me, youd know i dont have any. I simply just don't care how you feel once i dont respect you. That means id piss on you and not give two shits if you felt offended. You could simply stated you didnt like it and why and that would have been fine. Dont try and insult anyone with some self precieved intelligence that you dont possess. Do some fucking resesrch before you try and address me next time and ease dont take hours. I got shit to do today but ill eagerly await your response. Nobody is "scared" of you. Im jist not an idiot and i can remember shit, you apparently cant. So you wanna keep it going, i told you, i can do this all day. I enjoy pissing people off and hurting their feelings. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Its a fun film with a dark twist. Its a straight up comic book movie. Problem is most general people who think they know batman dont. This is about as close to the comic character as ive ever seen portrayed. Bruce Wayne is a fucked up individual. Def not how hes been portrayed. I mean theres qn Internet meme of him slapping the shit out of Robin. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Of course you can do it all day, you have nothing else to do. Again, comprehension is lacking on your part. I never sad the movie was bad I said audiences don't like the movie. Hugely different arguments. One is my opinion of the movie and one is audiences as a whole. As far as RT scores, the only way to make sense of the audience response is to compare it to similar movies of the same genre. James Bond audiences are typically older and the Good Dinosaur would be younger and parents. You have to compare it to other comic movies where the audience is likely similar. This is such a basic concept of analysis that it's embarrassing, again, for you to try to compare it to these other films. I don't have to know you personally to judge you. Your posts give all the info needed to understand who you are. Forewarning, I'll be checking out here shortly. If you reply I won't be back to respond for a while. So you can masturbate and eat Cheetos in your basement for a few hours and dont have to do both with one hand while you desperately hit refresh on TGG with the other waiting for a reply.
You still have no real counter to support your position about the RT score. So drop it and walk away. Youre wrong period end of story about Rt scores. You can not like a movie and its ok but don't try and act like some tasteful god. Youre not, you got proven wrong with the scores. Spectre audience these days are the same as the one seeing BvS. This isnt the old James Bond. I picked those two for a reason. One is comparable and one isn't. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I disagree. This is a character that was created in 1939. There are many versions of Batman. This is just another version of Batman that has not been shown on film before. They did a decent job with this version but to say this is the actual Batman is far from true. Maybe you mean this is the Batman that you prefer. If so: That is fine.
