What is a legitimate news source to you? USAToday? TheHill? CNBC? RealClearPolitics.com? WesternJournalism.com? Washington Times? Washington Post? Chicago Tribune? Los Angeles Times? Can I stop now? Your decision to just cover your eyes and ears because you don't want to believe something just makes you look foolish. The quote I previously posted was not even close to vague, it was clear as day and came directly from Obama's Press Secretary. That you can not read it and easily understand it yet actually tell me I misunderstood it, is funny. How about this one? Is it another vague quote? It's Obama's own words.
St. Nino the grifter. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/27/u...column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Forget about Waterboy. He can't even tell the difference between intentions and statements on one hand and actual results and actions on the other. Hard to see how someone like that makes it through a normal day let alone a life.
What the fuck? This is trending Late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died during a meeting of an Austrian secret society founded by the Bohemian Grove as a feeder group for the real Illuminati – and the resort hosting the society is filled with esoteric artwork. Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...77af38-db20-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/197...-last-hours-with-a-secret-society-of-hunters/ When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died, he was at a West Texas ranch that was known to be a venue for a secretive society of high-class hunters that’s more than 300 years old and traces its origins to the Holy Roman Empire. A review of public records indicates that a number of men who were at the ranch with Scalia when he died were members of the International Order of St. Hubertus, the Washington Post reports. Two men with leadership positions in the Order had landed their private planes at the ranch over the weekend.
Another douche bag that always thinks they are right. That you choose to think an action that results in failure is any less in severity than the same action that is successful just shows you are a moron. I bet you think attempted murder should be punished much less severely than murder.
Why can't you get it through your thick head that there was no action, there was no filibuster? There was no delay in the confirmation process of Alito. I even gave you the definition from the Senate itself. Why are you so happy to chant la, la, la, la with your fingers jammed in your ears?
Ren . . . meet . . . Stimpy By the way, I've been posting here since the Jets drafted D'brickashaw Ferguson and you still haven't figured out the proper way to use ellipsis. Maybe you should go see a doctor.
Whether there was a filibuster by the definition you chose to post or if it was another effort to derail the nomination by Obama and his brethren is not really here nor there. The fact that you choose to deny anything happened even though Obama's Press Secretary stated that there was a filibuster Obama participated in is just telling of how delusional you are. Weigh your definition against Josh Ernest's statement that Obama joined in a filibuster and see which wins out by any rational persons reasoning.
Rough go? Hardly. Your narcissistic personality disorder is quite clear, the fact you pair it with being a passive-aggressive pussy is just funny.
Oh, you like what your message board ally said? What makes you think it appropriate to call me a pussy?
