FBI Investigating Hildabeast

All depends on which policies benefit you and your family. That's where we're all coming from.

And I am a cutie.

 

Ok now you're getting it.

But having said that, the methods upon which each side gets you what you think you are getting are just as nefarious.

There are no good guys here.

Acceptance of that is the first step.

_

 

"Man is by nature a political animal"

 

The extremes of your stupidity is astounding, you maybe should look up the meaning of "comparing" before attempting to use it in a sentence.

 

Please do mankind a favor and take too many morphine tonight. With more than a splash of alcohol. Please.

It is astounding that nature was kind enough to you to allow you to breed.

 

You pick up a dictionary yet? It may help you not look quite as stupid, maybe you can upgrade from imbecilic to moronic.

 

I understand you are not a lawyer. But in fact, and this should not surprise laypeople, prior course of conduct IS evidence.

I understand you do not want to be stand up. That's why I said we're done here. But I thought I would post this for the benefit of others.

 

Again, evidence of prior course of conduct is evidence. It is A BASIS for saying the same thing is happening again.

Is it dispositive evidence? No. Never said that. Here I think some might have an issue with the concept of proof being an absolute term. Meaning you either have no proof, or proof beyond any doubt. In the real world deductions are often made, we do it every day, many times a day, with something less than absolute proof.

But when you couple prior course of conduct evidence with motive, then you are moving closer to a logical deduction.

The budget deal that cost approximately $800 billion was reached in order to head off a default on the nation's currency and to raise the debt limit. We know that the GOP has some percentage of its caucus that feels that defaulting, or perhaps more accurately threatening to default, is a fair and useful tool in negotiations with the Democrats and Obama. It has happened before (see prior course of conduct).

At the same time, though, there is a fairly widespread recognition that the government shutdown back in 2013 was bad for the image of the GOP as a national party, and that such recognition is shared by a majority of the GOP's caucus. But at the same time that view is not shared by everyone in the caucus.

Meanwhile many figures in right wing media believe that the threat, and even actual government shutdowns, are legitimate negotiating tools and even beneficial to advance other GOP objectives. And beyond that that GOP legislators who compromise in order to avoid defaults are not sufficiently supportive of the overall GOP and hard right positions.

The case of Eric Cantor's defeat in a primary in 2014 is an example of how a legislator, even one who most would consider very conservative, can lose if he is seen as willing to compromise on issues like the debt ceiling:

Over the last few years, it became more apparent to Cantor that if he became speaker of the House he’d need to work with Democrats to govern, while also presiding over a seemingly ungovernable GOP. He slowly evolved from Speaker John Boehner’s top rival into a more conciliatory conservative, willing to make deals, for example, on the debt ceiling. He also began devoting more time and energy to articulating conservative policy alternatives than most of his peers in the Republican conference.

Cantor privately chastised tea partiers in his conference who fomented the 2013 government shutdown, came out in favor of restoring parts of the Voting Rights Act, and helped craft a watered-down DREAM Act that would provide a path to legalization for immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally as children. But he seemed to do so with fairly little regard to how rock-ribbed conservative primary voters back home would react to these pragmatic gestures.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-we-can-learn-from-eric-cantors-defeat/

And of course Cantor lost his primary.

So, when again faced with a vote to raise the debt ceiling and avoid a government shutdown, it is a fair deduction given the foregoing that the vote no hope yes caucus (or at least some portion of it) did just that. This is much more than no basis, as I was accused of having.

The point here is that many GOP members voted no who were happy to see the deal passed, and a government shutdown avoided. The actual number who voted in favor of the bill understated its actual level of support.

To be clear I think the way Ryan led his caucus through this was smart politics. But there is a level of hypocrisy here that smells.

 

Nice personal attack.

Ftr I am far more intelligent than you, much better informed, and have taken the far more persuasive position here in arguing with you. You simply do not like that I disagree with you and have shown the errors in many of your arguments. There is of course nothing wrong with me.

You on the other hand? I really don't know.

Try to avoid making it personal. You only make yourself look like a loser.

 

Prior acts, in and of themselves, is proof of nothing further. We are done because you have no proof, only a guess.

 

Getting whacked by the party machine for not toeing the line? I'll see your Eric Cantor and raise you a Joe Lieberman. Works both ways.

If you want (or need) to go 'GOP' with it, here's an even more clear cut example of "you cross lines and we'll cut your balls off": Louisiana Republican Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne after he endorsed the Dem. candidate John Edwards over Republican David Vitter (who btw was also a dbag "D.C. madam john" a la Elliot Spitzer). Anyway, Dardenne was then referred to by the state GOP chairman as "the Nick Saban of Louisana politics" given that Dardeene started out his career in student government at LSU (and how the LSU-to-'Bama Saban is viewed as a traitor in La.). David Vitter even went further saying "Jay has ended his political career." Funny thing though: after Dem. Edwards won the governorship, he promptly appointed his Republican endorsement buddy Jay Dardeene Commissioner of Administration, a very powerful post in the Gov's adminstration - talk about landing on your feet. Party whacking and/or back scratching -again, works both ways.

And closer to home, whether you liked the guy or not, think about when David Patterson got knee-capped by Obama.

 

You don't understand what proof means, you don't understand that proof in any event is not the same as no basis, and you are not a stand up guy.

Now we're done.

 

Obamacare has given my mother health coverage. Before the Affordable Care Act, health insurers quoted her at $3000 a month because of pre-existing conditions. Now? She pays $200 a month and can get her medications and can see doctors. It is a life saver. People take coverage for granted and the fact that the GOP wants to get rid of it, is absolute horseshit.

 

Watch Hillary get elected the same week she has a judgment against her and then President Gay Cokehead immediately pardons her on the way out the door.

 

"President Gay Cokehead"?