Check out the video...Unreal. Wow WORLD EXCLUSIVE: First footage of Paris terror attacks shows diners diving for cover as AK47-wielding jihadist sprays café with bullets... and the victim who only escaped because his gun jammed Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-victim-escaped-gun-jammed.html#ixzz3rtBwnrpU The Daily Mail can reveal that the gunman responsible for the attack on the restaurant, which is not being named for security reasons, is believed to be 26 year old Belgian born Salah Abdeslam. The terrorist seen in the footage bears a striking resemblance to Abdeslam, who fled Paris after the attacks and evaded capture after a shocking blunder by police near Franco-Belgian border. He remains at large.
Yes, yet somehow this particular place produces above average number of misfits. It's not just poverty, as attested by Brook's experiences. You see, facts are stubborn bitches. It's not Christians or Jews or Hindu who threaten world. So if people of all kinds are born equal as I certainly believe, if all parents want the best for their kids, why is it that Islamic world produces so disproportionally many terrorists?
If you don't agree with a leftist viewpoint you're a racist and a bigot no matter what. Come on Petrozza get with the program.
Thanks, man That's what I thought, that it was your father, an exceptional man, who raised you right, despite what's around you. What I want to understand is how come comparing to the rest of the world, disproportionally large numbers of kids in Islamic countries turn to radicalism. There is poverty and religion all over the world -- S. America, India, Africa, you name it. There must be something specific to Middle East that facilitates proliferation of extremism in youths minds.
I have a lovely bag of candy. However, 15-25% of the brand has been poisoned. How many pieces would you like? How many pieces would you like to take home to your family? I forget where I saw this but damn if it isn't accurate.
Are the peaceful Muslims the exception or the rule? And I am not referring to the quantity of them. The history of Islam is violence and Jihad, and it has been practiced that way throughout its entire history. Just because the vast majority of Muslims are evolving a non-violent practice of it doesn't negate what Islam is and continues to be. The terrorists are practicing it no different than Muhammed. That makes them the true Muslims.
No one has come even close to winning an argument with me in this thread. Bigot is saying "I don't want any Muslims in my country". If you don't like being called a bigot, stop discriminating against people.
I'm descriminating against terrorists. If this makes me anti-terrorist racist bigot -- I'm good with it. The only way I can stopping terrorists to come to my country is by stopping people with whom they are mixed in from coming here. If good law-abiding refugees want to be let into my house, THEY need to weed out poison from their midst. If THEY don't care to take care of their own poison, I have no intentions of letting them in. It's very simple really. However you want to define "beat terrorists": "kill them all", "re-educate them", "remove social reasons for becoming", whatever... you can not beat terrorists if you are dead. Therefore the #1 goal is to ensure stability of my country; therefore no refugees. And yes, I will gladly throw away 99% of good candies just to avoid 1% chance that my family will get killed by that 1 poison jelly. If the 99% majority are good, but doesn't want to do anything to clean itself from the rotten 1% -- it's on them. Maybe they are not as good as we're led to believe, but ultimately I don't give a shit about why. When they clean themselves from the poison and prove to me it's done -- I'll be screaming from the hilltop to let them in.
