Yeah but we also don't have the greatest rb group. Solid to slightly above average. Ivory isn't making anybody miss he needs blockers. Sent from my VK700 using Tapatalk
I think it was a holding or something. Don't think we have any def pi...correct me if I'm wrong. Sent from my VK700 using Tapatalk
We have the perfect RB group to run without a FB between the tackles, all physical and tackle breakers. You seem to want a FB for the sake of having a FB. I just think it's a waste of a roster spot.
That's the only doubt in my mind, I can have 6k to win 4k here, we look so much better offensively and better coached, the only doubt I'm left with is as you said it's the jets
I can see it but I honestly don't know what they'll do. We actually have some decent talent on offense for a change, so I could see them going a lot of different ways. Sent from my VK700 using Tapatalk
Has anybody else noticed that the Jets have been RIDICULOUSLY quick off the ball in this game? I've seen handfuls of plays that looked like offsides but were just unbelievable jumps.
I'm just guessing, too, for all I know Gailey found a new love for FBs while he was out of football. It'd probably be a lock for no FBs if our TE group wasn't in Intensive Care.
I know it's weird isn't it? I actually like 3 receivers in this game over Kerley. That's 6 receivers, we agree 3 rbs not counting fb. That's 9. I know were going with 3 qbs. They're not risking petty on the ps. 12. What else? Sent from my VK700 using Tapatalk