Immaterial to the issue counselor. The issue is Mr. Brady's acts to obstruct an investigation and destroy evidence when he was knowledgeable that a civil court action was potentially possible whereby the evidence destroyed was likely to be requested in discovery.
Pristine. Epic. Historic. Look up awesome in the Thesaurus. Now go look up cheating scumbag lying thieving tainted stench dickhead testicular cuntface fraudulent asswad. _
Well, i got to watch eli manning crush your soul twice, so that was fun....but more importantly, that has nothing to do with this thread...to me and the rest of the world, your titles dont mean dick, and they obviously seem to be worth a bit less to you too, otherwise you wouldnt be on a Jets board defending them....you dont get it do you? You cant win here kiddo
it must really blow to finally not have to defend "no superbowl since spygate" only to turn around and get punched in the mouth by another cheating scandle. I guess it goes with the territory, rooting for scumbags and all.
Hey Stokes, remember what you were doing the first Sunday in February 2008? Let's see how good your memory is.
I'm gonna bump this from the day the Brady suspension first came out. One of my favorite tweets of all time. Can you spot the troll?
Unless you are an old friend PatsFanTx reminiscing about the Pats SB cheating in a SB years ago, I have no interest in looking back on the last 7 years of my life. Too many loved ones died, too many happenings that my kids missed with their Mom, her Dad missed with her, moments we never had and we all can't recapture. Go grab a calendar and look back to a time your Mom, wife, sister, daughter, friend was dead. Have a good time with that. Thank you, no. _
Jesus. I'm sorry on behalf of him. Truly, that's just an awful thing nobody should have to ever experience. I cannot begin to imagine what that feels like.
I don't know what you're talking about then, it sounded to me like you were saying you lost close family members because someone asked you to think about 7 years ago and I was being respectful with that in mind. Reading it again I'm not sure why I should have thought otherwise?
