Let's say I hypocritically said no, teaching kids anti-gay curriculum is okay. Would that invalidate my argument that it is inappropriate? What's your point? To invalidate the position or to judge whether I am a hypocrite. Because unless I have revealed any hypocrisy in my post there is no reason to deflect the conversation into that territory rather than address the validity of my argument.
You are completely missing the point. What she is teaching has absolutely nothing to do with sex. She was teaching them about families and diversity. And the right wing anti-gay crowd is great with extrapolating to ridiculous "slippery slope" arguments that you call a straw man. If I had a dollar for every comparison I've heard between sam and polygamy or people marrying animals, I could retire comfortably tomorrow. And the derogatory terms used in your post are offensive and indicate that maybe you could have learned something from these four year olds or a teacher like that. Thankfully, you and others like you are dinosaurs and in 10 or 5 or even 2 years, those that opposed the concept of ssm will be viewed the same as those that opposed racial equality 50 years ago. And its America's youth that is going to lead the way on this issue. Young people today are just more tolerant, and it is refreshing. I just do not understand the intolerance towards some of our fellow people. What strikes me is that people like you and the other right wing crazies that oppose this as if it is a plague on humanity change course in a heartbeat when their child or close relative comes out. Then they realize that the person they loved their entire lives are not evil or abnormal or different in any way. And they realize that all gays want is the same things that everyone takes for granted - to live life without fear of being physically harmed, to be able to keep their job, to be able to love and marry who they want, and to be able to raise children. Why is that so difficult to understand or accept?
Yeah. I'd much rather send them someplace to learn something wholesome, like religious instruction where they can be sexually abused by priests
To be honest i did just want to confirm your stance. i am not trying to deflect or change the convo at all. kindergarten is far to young to be teaching these things as children at that age do not have the mental capacity.
So basically you can't dispute my assertion so you try to counter it with an argument to extreme. Thank you for admitting you either aren't interested in or capable of discussing it from an position of reason or logic. Hint, your reply has nothing to do with the discussion of whether it is appropriate.
I did address the argument. Read my prior post. She is not teaching sex, she is teaching about family and diversity and tolerance. As for extremes, the arguments against SSM have and still are based entirely on misplaced fears and absurd extremes and a complete made up interpretation of scripture. My "extreme" example is not extreme at all,but is an unfortunate reality for many children who were preyed upon for decades by the very institutions that are leading the opposition to SSM. It's hypocrisy at its worst.
talking about sexual orientation isn't about sex? great. go ahead and use any nonsensical logic necessary to push your agenda. you are the one missing the point
I didn't read this giant block of shit but I did notice something about dinasaurs and polygamy while staring at it. congrats, you're officially hysterical.
Sexual orientation is not only about sex. It's about who you are attracted to. Did you know that some couples (gay, bi or straight) have sexless relationships and/or marriages? They are seek out the companionship of a particular gender. Did you know that there are straight guys who date trans girls? Did you know that there are genetic gay men who date trans men? I could go on on about various relationship dynamics. I had a huge crush on a girl when I was in kindergarten. the crush wasn't about her vagina and me putting my penis into it. My friend knew he was gay at 5 before he knew what gay and sex were. What agenda are people pushing? The equality agenda.
You're over complicating something that is very simple. Gay guys like to fuck men. Gay women like to fuck women. Straight people like to fuck the opposite sex. This is something that 4 year olds don't need to learn about. The agenda isn't equality. The agenda is trying to force everyone to like and even celebrate gays and try to shame anyone who doesn't comply. well you all can seriously fuck off with that agenda. everyone deserves to be treated equally by the government but that doesn't mean we should be forced to fly rainbow flags. shove your rainbow flag up your ass and keep your pride parade out of our nursery schools.
Thank you for outing yourself as a bigot. Not only are you a bigot, but also an ignorant bigot. I would try to educate you, but that would be like educating Bill O'Reilly about why the tides go in and out.
call me whatever you want it doesn't bother me. it doesnt change anyone's mind. I don't bow to shaming techniques typically employed by the likes of yourself. thank you for outing yourself as a typical modern pussy
Nah, I hit your nerve. You indicated that by saying that you don't care what I call you. That is the calling card of a butthurt puss. Thanks.
I just want to make sure that you know not everyone is affected by your bullshit approach. unfortunately too many people bow to the tactics you employ and refuse to stand up and say what they really think and believe. you're so mad I don't want to celebrate faggots and fly a rainbow flag. you'll get over it. one day.
