i think it's richardson, but that doesn't take away from mo's greatness and does not mean we have to decide between the two
Sheldon is the better player but Mo seems to be the harder worker/better person. Ive said before on here that Sheldon has a little bit of Revis in him to me. I think he would've already held out last offseason if he was in Mo's spot. But I think Sheldon could still perform at a high level without Mo on the opposite side. Mo might take a dip in production without #91.
Richardson and by far, and that's no slight to Wilk. Wilk is an all pro, Richardson will be on that Watt level soon
I went with Mo just because there is a larger sample size and I think Mo takes up a lot of double teams which helps Richardson. Plus I think Richardson is a bit of a loud mouth and is more likely to be seeking a huge pay day than Mo...but you never know. I could see Richardson superseeding Mo in the long run but it's too early to tell.
It's my opinion that Richardson, is to some degree, a product of Mo requiring more than one blockers on most plays. Both fantastic players that need to retire from this team someday.
I voted for Richardson. You can't really go wrong either way, but I just like Richardson more. I think that he and Wilk are incredibly versatile. Both can play inside or on the end. Richardson to me is just a bit more explosive.
As far as harder worker I think its the opposite. Last year an opposing player called out Mo for not working hard on every play saying he's too good to take plays off (I can't remember where I saw it but I think it was posted on this site) You NEVER see Sheldon give up on a play. He is the guy running 30 yards down field chasing down plays. And I think Sheldon is the better player
Yeah I remember that too, it was one of the Bills players and on an audio clip. And Sheldon did get himself injured trying to chase down the Vikings RB (McKinnon?) in a meaningless OT the next to last week.