Yeah, I got it. Defense of Sanchez is always baseless. Throwing out "baseless" opinions doesn't mask the real intent. It's ok. _
You can imagine you never implied that, but you know you're lying to yourself. Let it go, it will eat you up in the end. _
You can imagine that you didn't get caught pretending that I wrote something which I never wrote, but you know you're lying to yourself. Let it go, or your lack of competent reading comprehension will eat you up in the end.
Oh no it's ok, I'm bored and my reading comprehension is quite good. Folks enter Sanchez threads for 3 reasons--to defend him, to crush him or to mock those who are engaging in the argument (and that group is overwhelming in what would be colloquially called the "hater" group"). Your attempt to craftily extract yourself from the last two groups is belied by your mocking attacks on "baseless" speculation. Let it go, Have a glass of wine. Free your mind. _
An analysis of your posts in this thread would beg to differ. Interesting generalization, but none of this is relevant to the discussion at hand (i.e. You horribly misinterpreting a point I made that, in all actuality, had nothing to do with Mark Sanchez) Your attempt to craftily rationalize your grossly incompetent reading comprehension in this thread is . . . quite amusing. It's ok, you probably just hastily read my post and assumed that, because I don't like Sanchez as a player, I was arguing something that, in point of fact, I most certainly was not. I forgive you. Let it go. In the future, read more carefully and intently. It will ease your mind.
Ah yes, your perception is so embedded in your mind that even you don't understand what you are arguing. It's okay, it's pretty obvious. Don't forget the wine. It'll help you ease your mind. _
Ah yes, your reading comprehension was so laughably incompetent in this discourse, that you just can't bear to acknowledge the unavoidable reality that you based your entire pedantic argument on a blatant misinterpretation. It's okay, it's pretty obvious. Don't forget to read more carefully and intently in the future . . . It will ease your mind. I promise.
Again with the strawman reading comprehension deflection. Venturing into a Sanchez "circle jerk" with your embedded perceptions will do that to you. Can't change who you are, embrace it and THAT will ease your mind. _
Again with the delusion that you being exposed for hopelessly misinterpreting or purposely misconstruing my post somehow does not do irreparable harm to your entire argument. You recklessly painted yourself into a corner. Venturing into a discourse between two posters without carefully reading at least one of their posts will do that to you. You can't change who you are (or your cognitive reading level, for that matter), so just embrace it . . . and THAT will ease your mind.
Sanchez haters venturing into what they self describe as a Sanchez "circle jerk" and fallaciously trying to purposefully misconstrue your own intent was the reckless decision here. You can't escape who you are and your arguments, no matter how hard you try to cloak them, are always colored inelibly by your pre-conceived perception. You can continue to try to hide it but it won't fly. _
Despite your many transparent deflections and hopelessly misguided references to sophistry, you can't escape the verity that you embarrassingly based your primary contention on a sophomoric misinterpretation of written prose. No matter how desperately you try to circumvent your reading comprehension blunder, it will always serve to definitively and irrefutably ruin the logical integrity of your argument. You can continue to blatantly ignore reality in an alarmingly intellectually dishonest fashion, but it won't fly with anyone who can read above an 8th grade level.
You have a low definition of quality QB. You consider Dilfer a Quality QB, he was a quality backup QB, a fact you've stated when I've compared Sanchez as to being nothing more than a Dilfer. Dilfer "won" a superbowl, well he came in mid season to replace the horrible Banks at QB for Baltimore and "led" the 2000 Ravens (one of the best defenses EVER with a great running game (jamal Lewis and Priest Holmes). You've called Dilfer a QB you can win with...yet they won once, in a season that he only started 8 games....8.....You've embraced the comparison of Sanchez to Dilfer...who needed an ELITE defense and running game to over come 11 picks in 8 starts (along with 9 fumbles). And Dilfer was so good and so valued by the Ravens and the NFL that he was gone from the team and signed as a backup QB in Seattle... He appeared in more than 6 games in a season only 2 times after that "GREAT" 2000 season. That's who you've accepted as the comparison point for Mark. a journey man backup who QB'd half a season for one of the best defenses of all time.....That's setting a really low standard for a quality QB....unless you're talking about as a Quality backup...which is what Mark is right now...a quality veteran backup QB who, like Dilfer when he was a starter, was viewed as one of the worst starting QB's in the league, just as Mark is regarded by most clubs, scouts, etc as at best right now a Backup QB who was horrible as a starter. And that is the point that you can't overcome Junc, you're idea of quality is to be mediocre.
Awww, best comment you can make is to call someone an average fan....take your hand out of your shirt you little Napolean you
it's clear from your posts, you don't have a clue. stop wasting my time until you post a rational, intelligent argument.
Aww, c'mon man. you're on your "I'm in a corner so I'll just call everything unintelligent or average fan" defense. You can't defend having accepted the Dilfer Sanchez equivalency. Don't waste my time with your manlove.
you clearly know very little, now you are bashing Dilfer. you are an average fan. you need 300 yd pass games to prove who is a good QB. Thank you for your time.
I'm bashing Dilfer? The Ravens bashed Dilfer when they let him go, the NFL bashed Dilfer when he could only get backup gigs after "winning" the superbowl. BTW, those who try to establish themselves as superior by referring to everyone else as inferior is always the one who knows the least.
Chicken Fingers, They're good. Foles, pays attention to game...doesn't stuff his face. Sanchez.....well...chicken fingers...they're good. http://www.totalprosports.com/2014/10/17/mark-sanchez-recommends-the-chicken-fingers/
