The Fappening & Fap 2.0 (Jennifer Lawrence & other celebs have leaked themselves to the world)

Discussion in 'BS Forum' started by Poeman, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Of course I knew it. I'm waiting for The League to start, in the meanwhile it's fun picking on illogical morons.

    _
     
  2. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,348
    Likes Received:
    24,109
    I've actually done well by searching out series shows that have been around a few years. I'm on Boardwalk Empire now. But a man does need to take a shit now and then.
     
  3. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    I'm with 101 on this one. I don't know what he meant, but my view is this.
    Anything in the bedroom between 2 consenting adults is fine by me. It's private.
    Taking a picture (yes, even if you don't intend to show it to anyone) cancels the privacy. It's like a secret that is shared no longer a secret.

    From my perspective recording bedroom exercises is like doing it in public. I'm not sure I'd go as far as "slut", but I see 101's point.
     
    Brook! likes this.
  4. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Speaking about... Seen The League? I heard a plug today, sounded mildly interesting.
     
  5. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    It's been on for years. Great show. 10 PM tonite first of this season.

    _
     
  6. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Thanks, will record then catch up on Netflix

    No comment about my at least partial agreement with 101? I'm a little disappointed :)
     
  7. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    So you've bought into his illogical mixed message?

    You're a slut because you allowed the pictures to be taken? Because you wanted "attention" with private photos?

    The deviant act of having cum shot all over your face is perfectly acceptable by normal peoples standards.

    Photographing it is what makes one a slut.

    And allowing a private photo get to sucked up by the cloud and hacked makes you an attention seeking slut.

    Which is the worst kind of slut.

    A bucket of cum on the face, meh, not so bad.

    _
     
  8. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Wait for it.

    _
     
  9. silent scream

    silent scream Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,803
    Likes Received:
    59
    The problem is that they don't realize they're dumb so they'll never understand. It shall from now on be known as Barcs syndrome.
     
  10. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Ahhhh that's better :)
    First, I said I wouldn't go as far as "slut", don't try to extrapolate this on me.
    Second, in my opinion taking picture = making it public, regardless of intent to share.
    I'm not arguing against her bathing in cum; I'm arguing against her bathing in cum publicly. See the difference?
     
    #250 RuJFan, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2014
  11. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    No. If those pics were on a Nikon they would never have been "public". What if they were immediately deleted?

    If they were taken with Polaroids would that have been "public". What if they were immediately burned?

    Is it that nanosecond of the picture existing that makes them public? Or them being made public?

    How is a private photo unknowingly sucked up into the cloud then hacked and made "public" on the subject?

    If those celebs had posted them on the internetz or were so careless with them that they allowed them to be posted then it's on them.

    If some of those women took totally private photos for their own whatever with no thought that they'd ever possibly be out of their control, what's worse, the cum shot or the shot of the cum shot.

    It's the same thing and if the cum shot isn't wrong, neither is the photo.

    _
     
  12. deerow84

    deerow84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    421
    Doesn't seem to be on for me, showing The Bridge instead (note: I live in Canada)
     
  13. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    They are public because they exist, yes.
    If you stop for a second, you'll realize this is the core of our disagreement. You believe that a picture can be private, I don't. Any picture however taken is subject to become public. Hence, I treat any picture as public.
    Edit
    For future references I believe the same about any form of media, especially digital. If it can be on a computer screen, it can become public, thus is treated as public.
     
    #253 RuJFan, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2014
  14. Cappy

    Cappy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    110
    What if I took a picture but there was no film in the camera?
     
  15. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    maybe things would be simpler if she swallowed
     
    JetsVilma28 and RuJFan like this.
  16. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Like putting your thumbs and index fingers to make a rectangle in front of your eyes and loudly saying "click"? I guess there was no picture :)
     
  17. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    More pleasant too
     
  18. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    YOU may treat them as public but that's irrelevant to the discussion.

    None of my pictures are public unless I make them public.

    If someone steals my Nikon, that makes them public?

    So if someone hacks into my bank account, that's public and my money becomes free money?

    But again, is the photo of the act that makes the slut the slut? Or the act that makes the slut the slut?

    And if the photos were never meant to be made public, what attention was the attention slut seeking?

    Multilayered illogical concepts.


    _
     
  19. RuJFan

    RuJFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    LOL
    Stokes, we are discussing my opinion.
    How I treat them is the only thing that is in fact relevant to this discussion.
     
    soxxx likes this.
  20. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    You were agreeing with 101s views which are scattershot and illogical. We'd have to start from ground zero with you to restart the narrative.

    I only have 10 mins.

    So in your mind, what's more slutty.

    A woman having a bucket of cum shot onto her face or taking a photo of it?

    Can't be both.

    _
     

Share This Page