What 30 second drive are you referring to? I don't believe I included the Jets kneeling into my points per possession calculation. Yes the Jets were so conservative after halftime? Let's take a look at their possessions below. Oh look 15 of Sanchez's 30 passes came from the start of the 3rd until the middle of the 4th. 2/3 of his passes came in the 2nd half. Run, run, pass, pass, pass, run, pass. (3/4) run, run, pass, pass, pass, pass. (2/4) run, run, pass, run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass (4/5) run, pass, pass (1/2) pass, pass, pass (0/3) pass, pass, pass, pass (0/4) Sanchez was not carving up the Colts D in the first half. He logically could not have. He only had 7-8 pass attempts! The Jets gave him more pass attempts in the 2nd half. This was Brees carving up the Colts D: Brees for 19 yards Spike Brees for 6 yards. Brees for 1 yard. Brees for 12 yards. Brees for 9 yards Brees for 5 yards Brees for 9 yards Brees for 7 yards. Brees for 16 yards. Brees for 13 yards. Brees incomplete. Brees for 12 Brees for 0 Brees for 4 Brees for 5 Brees for 6 Brees for 8 Brees for 8 Brees for 6 Brees for 9 Brees for 2. You tried to point out Brees and Sanchez gave their team the same amount of TDs and FG attempts, except for the fact that the Brees did it on less possessions making it a lot different and a lot more effective. The thought experiment was for some reason you think it's a fact that Brees doesn't win with the Jets D. I showed you that if the Jets D gave up points at the same rate the Saints scored points on the Colts D. On top of that, the Saints would have kept their coaching and special teams in this thought experiment. They also would have a Jets D that started off the game hot. With the Saints game plan of long offensive possessions and milking the clock, the Jets D probably never reaches double digit possessions and never folds like they did. So it is not a fact, it is an opinion you have that you barely backed up with PPG and that's it. My other problem was directly blaming the D for the Jets loss. Then mentioning missed FG which is you know ST and ignoring the fact that our best offensive possession in the second half gave us a 50+ yard FG. All 3 units let us down in the Colts game. Just to remind everyone, we were up 17-13 at halftime and had the ball to start the 2nd half. Missed 52 yard FG. Now we are down 20-17, still in the game. Punt from the Colts 49. Now the defense forces a punt. Down 20-17 still, punt from the Jets 43. Now we are down 27-17, still a chance if we can score quick. 3 and out, punt from the Jets 25. Down 30-17 now. Need a miracle, interception. For some reason you ignore the whole 3rd quarter where it was a one possession game and the Jets had 3 offensive possessions to do something about it. Now if we flip back to the Saints game, the Saints are up 13-10, IND scored to make it 17-13. NO scores again making it 17-16. Missed FG from IND, 7 points from NO to make it 24-17. The 3rd quarter counts too. Here's the thing, you are so quick to blame the defense and ST, you forget the offense no showed for the second half. So I throw some blame their way, like I do with the defense and ST. Of course I forgot about the Bills haha. Against NO, the Jets lost by 14 points. 7 came off of a 99 yard INT return. Another 7 came off a fumble in the EZ. Average QB play wins that game. It was 28-17 in the 4th quarter with 9 minutes left. That's a game. Obviously it became garbage time once Pitt scored again taking 5 minutes off the clock and going up 18 with 4 minutes left. Down 11 with 9 minutes left, definitely a game, I don't know why you ended the game so early. That's not actually watching the game, it's looking back at it retroactively. Top guy in a weak division padding stats? Yeah Tom Brady and Peyton Manning never did that in their really strong divisions and staying in blowouts late. Happens across the whole NFL, no need to punish just Rivers for it. And Rivers was on the field in IND for 3 quarters and got hurt. Why is the assumption a healthy Rivers doesn't do that? That would be like making the argument Brady didn't bring the Pats to the 2001 SB because he sat out for 3 quarters in the title game. Although that's actually more of an argument since he played less than 50% of the game and didn't score any poitns for his team, but like I said above, go back and rewrite NFL history if Rivers doesn't get credit for that title game. Mark did not play well in 11 of his 15 games. He played not terrible in 11 of 15 games. Played well in 1 or 2. You are talking in absolutes if it wasn't terrible it must be well. That's not accurate. There is a lot of room between terrible and well. Yeah Mark falls behind his peers in his rookie play, almost all of them, not just Marino and Luck. He falls behind because of his penchant for turnovers. I'm not saying Mark isn't vital. I was saying he wasn't great, so we agree. I never said the we make it without the pass O. I said Mark Sanchez was inconsistent and that with better pass Os led by 5-7 other QBs we could have done better.
You are a very weird indvidual, why are you bringing up something from like a month ago? Move on already....
Depends on whether you believe your painfully obvious insecurities will clash with those of the guy you have marked as your mortal TGG enemy.
You need to own up to your shit and agree you'll never do it again. You've been a douche for the last 10 months and if you continue your stupid dalliances you need to be reminded if it. If you are going to enter adulthood then we as a group can think about it. It's on you. _
What do you mean its on me? Its on you. I didnt bring it up in this topic, you and your troll buddies did. You guys are selfish, every single thread on this forum has been derailed and has been turned into the soxxx show BECAUSE you guys keep turning into that. Its not fair for the other members of this forum, they want to read about the topic, instead it becomes a "lets harass soxxx topic", over and over and over. Its on you to stop. I put the past behind me, now its you and your troll buddies turn to do the same.
This is a guys club. Own your shit and at some point we'll let it go. Stop being a fucking trolling child and we'll let it go sooner. It's on YOU. Not us. One more mention of lizards or Zetas or Australia and it's back on. _
No its on you, you are once again carrying out your personal vendetta on a public forum. I am not apologizing or conceding to anything that you want, ever, Not in this lifetime, and not in the next either. Stay mirin.
Ok, your choice. You sound like a hurt child. Prepare to continue to respond to your idiocy about saving lives and money loving scumbag owners. Own it or suffer the pain. _
