Which WR would you take at #18?

Discussion in 'Draft' started by Jets4eva9011, Apr 10, 2014.

?

Which WR would you take at #18?

Poll closed May 10, 2014.
  1. Bradin Cooks

    31.9%
  2. Marquise Lee

    26.6%
  3. Odell Beckham Jr.

    41.5%
  1. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    Aside from Watkins, I just think that Cooks, Beckham, and Lee are the best 3 WRs for the Jets' offense, and I also like Mathews and Adams more than Robinson. Have you read the WR metrics articles on RotoWorld. If memory serves me correctly, Robinson didn't rate very highly in those. I think too many of his routes were screens and I want a WR with more speed than Robinson has.
     
  2. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    If we could trade back 6 spots and still get either Cooks or Beckham, I'd be all for it, but there are no guarantees. Beckham could go to the Steelers or Ravens. Cooks could too, for that matter. It's too risky. If they are on the top of Idzik's board or are relatively equal in value to any DB or OT there, then I think they should go with the WR. Trading back up after trading down to add another WR is just silly. With the additional 3rd gained from trading down, the Jets could potentially add another quality starter or at least a very good depth/role player who would develop into a solid starter within a season or two. They don't need to draft two WRs that high. If they take a WR in round 1, they don't need to draft another until somewhere in the 4th-6th rounds.
     
    Red Menace likes this.
  3. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    What about trading back and getting say cooks at 24 and then with that 3rd and our 2nd trading to the end of the 1st to get fuller or verrett?
     
  4. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    No. Why are you obsessed with trading multiple high picks in a deep draft and when the Jets have multiple holes/needs? Quality GMs don't need to trade up to find excellent prospects. The Jets have too many needs/holes to even consider trading up.
     
  5. 101GangGreen101

    101GangGreen101 2018 Thread of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    22,232
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    You are playing a dangerous game if you think Cooks is available at 24. Very dangerous
     
  6. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    The only pick that we would be trading is the third rounder from us trading back ... We never had that pick in the first pick ... So in total we would still have 12 draft picks ... The same amount we started with ... Get a higher quality player in the end ... It's not trading multiple picks my man ... It's smart ... Not obssesed
     
  7. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
     
  8. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    If cooks isn't ... Lee will be ... Or OBJ will ... I'm pretty sure one will
     
  9. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,995
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    Why trade back and gain a third round pick when you can pick the guy you think fits best in your offense?
     
  10. Chris St. John

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    11
    I voted for cooks. I feel he has the talent on the field, in the workout room and in the study room. I feel like he's got "it".
     
  11. 101GangGreen101

    101GangGreen101 2018 Thread of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    22,232
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    There is a high probability none are there at 24.

    - Steelers
    - Ravens
    - Eagles

    3 teams that could take all 3 before the 24th pick.
     
    Red Menace likes this.
  12. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    well obviously the jets would have to have them all rated extremely close to do it.
     
  13. NyJ 7n7

    NyJ 7n7 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ur right ... It's risky but two of those teams pick before us ... I'm talking bout 2 of them being there when we pick and worrying bout the teams behind us ... Idk it was just a thought ... It's kind of pointless to talk about considering its something idzik would probly never think about haha
     
  14. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,342
    Likes Received:
    7,273
    Lee also played in a WCO so he will already be familiar with our concepts.
     
  15. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,995
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    All three present different advantages. It's not like you are going to the market and you have the chance to buy one of three bananas so you trade back in the line because the guys behind you only want oranges and blueberries.

    One will probably fit MM's offense better, and hopefully also have the better grade.

    Trading back and hoping that guy is still there is a stupid gamble.
     
    NCJetsfan and Red Menace like this.
  16. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,995
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    Taking that risk with only a third round pick to show for it is not a smart risk.
     
    NCJetsfan likes this.
  17. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,995
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    Eh, Marqise Lee. 6'0" and plays like he's 5'10". I'm not sure his height advantage is much of an advantage.
     
  18. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Were there even any on the clock trades in the 1st or 2nd round last year? Seems maybe there weren't.
     
  19. NYJetsO12

    NYJetsO12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    11,722
    Likes Received:
    7,635
    Not true. As a matter of fact, if taken in Rounds 1-2, they have an 84 % of making an immediate impact.

    http://grantland.com/features/how-tell-which-nfl-draft-picks-truly-valuable/
     
  20. heartpumpsgreen

    heartpumpsgreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    235
    I am not from Bizarro world I like to call reality home ... And the reality is that Stephen Hill is basically the same age as these guys. Odds say 2 out of these 3 guys, if drafted in mid-late first round will be busts. So I'd rather the Jets give Hill his 3rd year ... Which I think he deserves ... And draft a need at another position unless Mike Evans falls then it's a no brainer. You probably missed it on another thread but Stephen Hill actually had one of the LOWEST drop rates in the NFL last year with those targeted more than 50 times at an astounding rate of 1.7. Much to the dismay of ignorant Jets fan belief that he has butter fingers. He posted an abysmal 10.6 his rookie year just above Tavon Austin at 10.4 last year ... With more opportunities. Jets fans have tunnel vision when it comes to Stephen Hill. His story In the NFL is not over yet give the kid another year

    Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page