Thoughts on future pick trades

Discussion in 'Draft' started by milo, Feb 21, 2014.

  1. milo

    milo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    291
    I just wanted to gauge the thoughts of some of the more experienced draftniks here on trading future pics.

    With Mayock calling this the "the deepest and best draft class I’ve seen in probably ten years," and us having significant cap space to fill dire needs (ie. a Maclin-caliber receiver, a competent safety, and even a homerun-hitting pass rusher ala Orakpo - all while having $8-15 million left over), I'm wondering if Idzik and co. can't almost afford to look at this as a two-year exercise.

    We may end up with 12 picks this year, minimum 10, so there is already potential to package picks and move up a bit, but is it also worth it to consider using 2015 picks? I'm not talking about trying to grab Watkins at #5, I'm just making the argument that #36 and #51 this year might be worth more, long term and given the judged quality of this overall draft , to us than #54 and #86 next year.

    I am completely against trading next year's first rounder - even if Clowney falls to 10 - because anything can happen. We could go 2-14, Rex gets fired, we have a whole new philosophy...not likely, but could happen, and if it does you need a first round pick.

    But would you rather be down a second and third rounder next year for a shot at 4-6 long-term quality starters? Or keep a full boat for 2015, and get 2-4 out of this draft?
     
  2. jcass10

    jcass10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    2,095
    I don't put too much stock in the "deepest draft in 10 years" thing. Every single year from January until May we hear how deep the draft is. I cant remember ever reading an article about how little depth there is in a certain draft.

    I'm against trading up in general, so I don't think I would want to trade future picks. Finding late round gems is so huge in the NFL right now. It's what's allowing Seattle to contend for championships for probably 4 years. I suppose if the value was too much too pass up, I could probably be convinced. In general, I think I'd stay away from trading up.
     
  3. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Why would you trade future picks in a draft where you already have 10+? That's like insanity. Let's not just trade up let's really mortgage the future to do it because it's been so good to us in the past.
     
  4. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    2,302
    Since this year's draft is so deep, maybe you can give us some of your next year's 1st and 2nds for this year's. We will trade. We will let you trade up. Fair deal? I mean, I also hear that next year's crop isn't anything half as good as this year's. So - you don't lose much by giving us your next year's pick anyway. You will love the guy you pick with that trade up too! I guarantee it.
     
  5. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    I have always been against giving up future draft picks. There really isn't a player I feel the Jets "must have" to give up the future. There seems to be more talk in this forum this year, compared to the past, about trading picks. I think we need to temper our trading thoughts, Tanny is long gone and Idzik is going to be more cautious. If anything, I think Idzik would try to acquire some picks for 2015.

    While this draft is deep at certain positions, especially WR & DL, I don't consider it a extremely strong draft class, it's good not great.
     

Share This Page