1. I was no longer asking you, I was asking for someone else in this crapfest for a quick summary of how someone could say something so monumentally stupid because maybe I missed the context. 2. Don't tell me when I can post or when I can't post- until you become a mod feel free to mind your own business. 3. No one has ever learned anything from you informationally on this board other than that you may have narcissistic personality disorder. Seriously, no need to reply, I'll just wait for someone else to explain what average playoff wins per year and Peyton Manning and Tim Tebow have to do with each other. Thankee. _
1. of all the dumb things you say on this board you are bashing someone else for something you didn't even read? 2. I will tell you what I want, if you don't have something to contribute and want to whine like a school girl take it someone else. 3. the ones that read and pay attention learn, sad to say you aren't one of them. Your loss not mine, it's why you have to post asinine things whining about others rather than actually contributing.
I'm not asking you jackass, why are you whining and bitching like a little school girl. Feel free to continue with your childish insults, but I'm waiting for a rational poster not some narcissistic nut job to provide a short summary. Nobody learns ANYTHING from you, but narcissism won't allow you to understand that. Read THAT And learn. And you can tell me not to post and I'll continue to tell self- appointed Internet police to GFY. _
It's interesting how you take shots then whine when someone comes back at you. you are an angry little man.
the point isn't the situation surrounding why the kick at that distance had to be attempted, it is that you applaud Brady when his kicker makes a comparable kick, but criticize Manning when his kicker misses. regardless of whether Manning could have done more to avoid that kick at that length, it is a makeable kick, and either the QB deserves credit for getting them into that position to attempt it or he doesn't. whether it could have been better position is irrelevant.
Not whining, take shots all you want because they are harmless and I'm actually pretty happy. And I derive happiness from pointing out stupidity on the Internet when I'm bored. _
are you saying the situations were the same? if they were I'd agree but he had the ability to get them closer and failed this after TWO huge gifts to keep him and Indy in the game. and he KNEW what kind of K he had, a guy who had missed plenty of big kicks before yet he still couldn't get him closer. A 46 yarder should be made but it's not a chip shot. :lol: you are a sad man then. if the misery of others makes you happy that says a lot about you. I feel bad for you. when are normal you are a decent guy but you lose it way too easily.
I just don't understand folks coming into threads to take shots at people. If what I say is idiotic(and it may be at times) then attack the weak argument not the poster. it's so silly and childish and it drags down the board.
That's right, I actually forgot Kerry started that season for the Colts and didn't relieve Painter. More so proving that the Colts were trying to improve their team after finding out Peyton was done for the year. Then they went to Painter when Collins struggled, and then to Orlovsky. That's not the sign of a team who is trying to tank. No he didn't have Indy weapons, totally agree. But you don't need two HOF receivers to be good. He didn't win big. Unless your willing to then concede that Peyton has won big. Cause Peyton's been to way more AFC Title games then Mark has, and he's been to 3 Super Bowls. Mark helped get them far. But they came up short in his first 2 seasons. He shouldn't get all the credit just like he shouldn't get all the blame. I think thats fair. Your putting the fact that the Colts only scored 7 points in the final 3 quarters soly on Peyton's shoulders. Plenty of things can attribute to that besides a QB who threw for over 300 and completed 31 of 45 passes he threw. That team also scored 17 points. Good enough to win most games? Probably not, but it's not all the QB's fault. The Saint's defense was very good against the pass that year and poor against the run. Maybe more emphasis should be placed on the fact that Caldwell decided to only run the ball 19 times that entire game while averaging 5.2 yards per carry while doing it...
I'm sorry that my pointing out your stupidity makes you miserable, that was not my intention. I'm really not sad at all and believe me there is NO reason to feel sorry for me, thank you very much. I'd feel sorry for you but when it comes to you I am filled with apathy. _
trying to improve signing a 40+ yr old QB off his couch w/ a week or 2 to go to the season? To be fair, I thought they could win w/ Kerry but coming in that late and his eroding skills didn't work out. Peyton has only been to 2 more AFC title games than Mark(it was one until a few weeks ago) You can win big w/ Peyton Manning too, Peyton has won big just not as often as he should have. He doesn't get all the blame and too many people try to absolve him of any blame which the issue I have. He's the leader, the ball is in his hands every play, he has top 3 weapons to throw and hand off to. 300 yds is meaningless w/o points especially when he tacked on a bunch after the game clinching INT. he had the ball in his hands, was moving toward a tying TD and threw an INT for a TD to end the game. Nothing else matters. I thought Peyton calls plays? he gets so much credit for doing so when they win, now it was Caldwell's fault? come on. NO had a very good D but they had just been torched by another playoff choker at home in the title game so they weren't a perfect D.
you have issues, I couldn't be happier especially when laughing at you. I know you brag about yourself all the time, you have self esteem issues. Maybe a Napolean complex? I'm not sure what it is. If you think that stuff impresses me you would be wrong. If you can't keep up in discussions then save your whiny posts, if you'd like to participate please do.
I didn't attack you until you started to play board police and tell me when and when I couldn't post. Throwing out the attack card by you is incredibly ironic. All I asked was whether someone actually equated Peyton Manning's average playoff wins per year to Tim Tebow's average playoff wins per year and I had neither the time nor the interest in reading 12 pages of pure drivel to see if I missed something. Rather than you admitting it was silly or hyperbole or actually briefly explaining what you meant, you countered with your immature and childish default of "read it and learn" bullshit. If it was a silly attempt at hyperbole, then just admit it and let it go. If their per playoff average wins actually MEANS something then feel free to explain it briefly, or if not, allow someone else to do so- but don't tell me I can't ask the question or that someone else can't explain it. But either way I don't really give a half baked crap whether you want me to post in this thread or not. I'll do as I please, thank you very much. _
stop it, you don't fool anyone. you can continue to act childish and derail threads all you want. if that makes a sad man happy I'm all for it. it's irritating but I will survive a whiny poster kicking and screaming for attention.
Oh poor Junc, whining and upset that someone pointed out your silliness. It's interesting that every thread that YOU are heavily involved in seems to get derailed by EVERYONE else but you. That's textbook narcissistic personality disorder. But hey, I just thought what you said was silly, wanted to see if I missed the context. Now that it appears that the playoff per win average was a serious statement, it's no longer silly, it's monumentally stupid. Thanks. Carry on. _
Btw, I use hyperbole or sarcasm in my posts often- just to make a point. And when someone asks incredulously "are you serious?!?!?" I say "no, I'm not serious. I was using hyperbole or sarcasm. To make a point." It's pretty easy to do. _
