2013 NBA Playoffs Thread

Discussion in 'BS Forum' started by displacedfan, Apr 20, 2013.

  1. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,637
    Likes Received:
    24,605
    Of course. The Spurs are the Good Guys.

    I didn't think we would come out against the Grizz, and I have a worse feeling right now, so I'm picking against the Spurs again this time and hoping I'm wrong again.

    Heat in 6.
     
  2. Falco21

    Falco21 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    13,631
    Likes Received:
    10,895
    Spurs in 6.

    I think the Heat are on a severe decline. Wade is aging, Bosh is not making any shots, and other than Chalmers, there has been no help for Lebron. Indiana took them to game 7 with no offense and straight defense. The Spurs are a complete team with veteran talent and experience. They have the defense to defend Miami and they have the offense to score. I don't think anyone can contain Tony Parker and I don't think anyone will contain Lebron. The difference is, Spurs will have plenty of help from their role players. Miami has and will not.

    It will be a great series, but I'm calling Spurs in 6. San Antonio looks pretty awesome at this point. Just going by that, San Antonio is the better team as of late.

    Everyone seems to forget that Miami just almost lost the series against a team who had 40 wins in the season and is missing their best shooter. This will not be easy for Miami. They are not the team they were last year. This is going to be very reminiscent of Lebrons Cleveland days. Try and take the team on your back. Win against teams you are better then, but lose against teams you are not. San Antonio is a better team. If Lebron is doing it all by himself, they are done. It worked against Indiana, but it will not work against the Spurs.
     
    #1202 Falco21, Jun 6, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2013
  3. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    George Karl, the Coach of the Year, has been fired by the Denver Nuggets.

    Interesting decision, not sure why. Karl has had trouble leaving the first round of the playoffs, and he was given the team "he wanted" and they got the 3 seed this year. Gallo goes down and they struggle to replace him in the playoffs. Oh well, I guess overall picture Denver wanted a new HC
     
  4. matt robinson 17

    matt robinson 17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,158
    Likes Received:
    8,027
    2-3- 2 format hurts Spurs, never will understand it, if they split in Miami, I would say they would have to sweep at home, which is almost impossible
     
  5. JetBlue

    JetBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    11,669
    Likes Received:
    5,892
    the first time the home team won all three in the middle was 05 with the Pistons. since then it has happened twice again, both being Miami.

    I hate the format as well, because in general it forces the team without HC to win twice on the road, but in recent years it hasn't been terribly uncommon so almost impossible is an overstatement.
     
  6. matt robinson 17

    matt robinson 17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,158
    Likes Received:
    8,027
    They drag the season on forever then they're afraid to have 2 more travel days to keep it fair?
     
  7. matt robinson 17

    matt robinson 17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,158
    Likes Received:
    8,027
    Nuggets fire Karl
     
  8. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Imo the purpose of 2-3-2 is to guarantee the finals goes 6 games. Winning 3 straight is hard, chances are the road team wins one of those which means there will be a 6th game.

    What happened last year was surprising, the Thunder shoulda won one of the three but they didnt.
     
  9. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    2-3-2 is dumb in my opinion especially after going 2-2-1-1-1


    I don't think the lower seed should ever have played more home games than the higher seed at any point in the series. That way if you go by the home team should win idea, the home team/higher seed is always up or tied in the series and never down. The higher seed should never have their backs against the walls until game 7.
     
  10. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    27,389
    Likes Received:
    28,577
    Get out the brooms. I'm calling for a Heat sweep. (I'll gladly be wrong though!)
     
  11. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    I don't think 2-3-2 guarantees a sixth game very well.

    2012: 5 games
    2009: 5 games
    2007: 4 games
    2004: 5 games
    2002: 4 games
    2001: 5 games
    1999: 5 games
    1995: 4 games
    1991: 5 games
    1990: 5 games
    1989: 4 games

    That span covers 24 finals. 11 failed to reach a sixth game. That's 45.8333...%

    One out of every six finals in that span resulted in a sweep.

    And only three times there was a Game 7. There were more sweeps than there were seven game Finals.
     
  12. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    speaking of scheduling, it'd be nice if they could start earlier than 9 PM, considering Game 1 is in the Eastern timezone.

    Instead, we get NBA and NHL going head to head again. NHL is being played in LA, NBA in Miami.

    I want to meet the person who decided that 9 PM is the beginning of primetime, because it certainly is not.
     
  13. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    There must be something more involved here. How do you fire the coach of the year after 57 wins, and losing in the playoffs with an injured Gallo? I can see they are concerned about 1st round exits, but seriously, that's just dumb unless Karl is about to get hit with kiddy porn charges or something else Sandusky-esc.
     
  14. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    I don't see the Spurs winning. I also don't like 2-3-2 format, it gives more of an edge to the road team, IMO. Wasn't it like that like 15 years ago? So they changed it and eventually changed it back. I wonder why. I agree with the Miami in 6 notion, however. They will steal at least one of the 3 on the road. I am not convinced by this year's spurs yet.
     
  15. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    They never changed it. It's always been 2-3-2 for the finals.

    Originally the rationale was to avoid excessive travel, like when LA played Boston in the Finals fairly often. Flying in those days isn't like it is now. Flying coach, no chartered jets, cramped seats for 7 footers, etc.
     
  16. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Listening to Francesa makes me want vomit. He picked the Grizzlies last round and is giving the Spurs no real shot because they are to old. The only player whos showing his age is Ginobli. Duncans playing great, Parker is way better than he was 6 years ago. Guys like Leonhard, Splitter, and Green are all nearly as important as Ginobli at this point and are still in their youth

    Hes acting like if Ginobli doesnt show up we are fucked, Ginobli has been sloppy all year and we have made it this far. If anything Leonhard has passed Ginobli on importance level and is now the new member of the big 3.
     
  17. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Fuck the times man, maybe if the Knicks made the damn finals and the rating drop after 10:30 then the NBA will be forced to start the games earlier. I feel bad for the people that got work at 8 or 9.

    I wish I lived on the West Coast. Game starts at 6, ends at 9, then get to watch a postgame till 10 and then can pass out.
     
  18. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    they tailor the playoffs 100% for the west coast, which doesn't make a lot of sense considering the east coast TV market dwarfs the west coast.

    Games should not be starting after 8 PM local time.

    They say 9 PM which means tip will probably be like 9:10 after they're done with their prolonged ceremonies and time-wasting. The game will probably end around 11:45-11:50, assuming no OT. Primetime is really 8-10 PM.

    Anyone who attends the game (media, players, coaching staff, fans) won't get back to wherever they're staying until at least 12:30 AM, I'd guess.
     
  19. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    im pumped right now.
     
  20. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Knowing ABC games from earlier these playoffs, 9PM means 9:07-9:13 ish. TNT was starting 8:30 games at around 8:32 which was nice. Maybe ABC can start at 9:02.
     

Share This Page