News Tribune: Seahawks cap space years in the making...

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Harpua, Mar 20, 2013.

  1. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    I think the media will beat the drums. I think most of the fan base is expecting a down year so if it happens they won't be surprised
     
  2. ArmandJ

    ArmandJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    54
    They're elite because they're trying to do things to make themselves better. What did we do last year? Sign Tebow....yeah, that's GREAT. That's how you build an elite organization.

    They sucked, but it's a 'what have you done for me lately' league. The 49ers sucked for a while, but how many fans really remember that now? That's why yours and rico college's argument about Jets being better than Seahawks is inane. They may have been better then...but now? Fat chance.

    Tl;dr: They got better, while we got worse.
     
  3. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Funny how you left that last year off. Also that you do not account for tanny being the guy that ran the cap into the ground so badly that we had to let go a ton of starters, are saddled with Sancez, and traded for the great distraction known as tebow. For a cap guy he really fucked our cap over.

    Back to Seattle, they had mild success while rebuilding, last year they made the playoffs while in one of the toughest divisions in football, and now are moving forward with a very competitive young roster. Yea I would hate to be in that position in a few years.

    I'm happy for the first time in well over a decade we have someone outside of the Parcells tree calling the shots. It was past due for a fresh approach at building a team.
     
  4. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Rex's mouth can be embarrassing at times, but he is a hell of a coach.

    This year with Marty running the O should at least field an exciting Competitive team. Ground and pound became really dull and drab last year. First down run between the center and guard was about a 70/30 split. We really needed to change things up on that side of the ball. On defense I expect us to still bring the same aggressive scheme with the younger LB. it should be a exciting season to watch even if its below what some fans expectations.
     
  5. JETS1116

    JETS1116 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    536
    Loaded at RB? Washed up LT and Shonn Greene averaging less than 4 ypc?
     
  6. Biggs

    Biggs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,902
    Likes Received:
    4,298
    I worked for the Jets, you got a point? His dad worked for the Jets and he played some football. I don't think his coaching the Aberdeen Oilers is exactly a resume for NFL success. The guy is essentially a contracts man with some general football background, no different than Mike T.
     
    #46 Biggs, Mar 20, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2013
  7. laxin

    laxin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    23
    Yeah it will be interesting. He's always needed Vets like Bart, Jim Leonhard and even Pouha and Revis. Without those players moving forward (assuming Revis is traded), I wonder how Rex will handle it. He's going to have to have other veterans step u like Harris and even Wilkerson and take on a bigger role. We've been talking about this with Harris for years though...

    Realistically, I would say 3 years. Im going to assume Sanchez is a lost cause at this point, because he hasnt proven otherwise in recent years. If we get lucky and are in position to draft a franchise QB next year, then that could be cut down to 2 years if he can step in and perform immediately.
     
  8. laxin

    laxin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    23
    I agree. Its clear that Idzik had his team on the rise while Tanny had the Jets on a downward trend. Idzik maintained a low cap while loading the roster with cheap, young and talented players while keeping every position competitive. Tanny on the other hand risked everything for a 2 year window, overpaying veterans about to exit their prime and trade multiple picks for just 1 player. He inflated the cap and caused this mess we are in right now. The Seahawks on the other hand havent given out huge contracts and have a lot of players on their roster who havent even hit their prime.

    The Seahawks are set up to be competitive for the next 4+ years. We were set up to win big in 2010 and failed.

    I wonder which one is better?
     
  9. Biggs

    Biggs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,902
    Likes Received:
    4,298
    Before the rookie salary cap was impossed Tanny was clearly very succesful and Seattle sucked. Seattle hasn't won dick yet even though the rule change that they didn't know was coming came and favored a different approach.

    Tanny was clearly setting us up to unload salary this year and next and Idzik so far is carrying out that plan.
     
  10. Ben Had

    Ben Had Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2011
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    84
    The Seahawks have something the jets don't ... A franchise QB!
     
  11. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,848
    Likes Received:
    13,039
    Point well taken, Seattle should not be in the same list as the rest. I would say though that defensively they appear to have made some pretty good drafts and overall they look like a young explosive and aggressive Team with nothing but upside. I cant help but think they seem to have a much more cohesive leadership approach than us aimed at the long run and pointing the ship in the right direction.

    100% correct, Johnson is all over the map, that was part of our problem, not sure where the fit is between the GM and the HC. Net year moves will tell us if on the same page or not. Something tells me Johnson will let the new GM alone.
     

Share This Page