My Revis conflict

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by abyzmul, Jan 12, 2013.

  1. Unhappyjetsfan

    Unhappyjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,025
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Oh ... so what you're saying is that (according to your example), the Jets will likely be just as good by trading Revis as they are right now with him? Okay, great - let's trade him. Because if we don't trade him, he might not be on the team anyway next year (free agent) and we won't have the draft picks to balance out the loss.

    /Your example sucked.
    //Yes, I'm making fun of you.
    ///I'm sorry it's going to interfere with your hero-worship, but I'd like to see a championship in my lifetime.
     
  2. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Dude, it was clear to me he said they would be no worse than they were without him the last 13 games of last season. Not to jump in on the argument, but ftr I also am highly doubtful the Jets will transform themselves into a powerhouse if they trade Revis for picks and turn them into home runs, however many they are, all of them.
     
  3. Unhappyjetsfan

    Unhappyjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,025
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Yeah? Well, I'm highly doubtful the Jets will transform themselves into a powerhouse too. You want to know why? Because I've been a fan of the team since 1984 and during that time they have been competently run for three years (1997-1999). You'd have to be an idiot to believe it's likely that anything this team does is going to transform them into a powerhouse (particularly with this nincompoop we have as owner).

    But that's not what's being discussed here. What's being discussed here is: What makes the Jets most likely to win a championship as quickly as reasonably possible? And that answer to that question is obvious ... trade Revis for the best available deal right now.
     
  4. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    It's rough. We've seen many players come and go and have success elsewhere.
     
  5. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,480
    Likes Received:
    2,299
    Jimmy Johnson was a fucking dumbass. Q.E.D.
     
  6. Unhappyjetsfan

    Unhappyjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,025
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Are you kidding? He was arguably the best personnel man in league history.
     
  7. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,480
    Likes Received:
    2,299
    How did he even dare to think about trading their lone bright star from their wretched 1-15 franchise? He had to hold on to Walker no matter the cost.

    See? He is a fucking dumbass. Agree?
     
  8. Unhappyjetsfan

    Unhappyjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,025
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Ah. Appears I need to replace the batteries in my sarcasm detector.
     
  9. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393
    They already made that move. They got an OC that produces offenses, like Rex's defenses.
     
  10. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    Typical SOJF loser attitude. Hey we have a guy that's the best corner since Deion Sanders. Let's trade him! How could you tell me that at best a late first and a conditional pick get us closer to a championship then the best corner in the NFL? Give him his 16 million even if it means taking a lesser pick from a team and shipping Cromartie out of town in order to clear the books.

    I'd literally walk you through what I was trying to say, but seeing as how others came to the same conclusion I did, I'm not going to waste neither the time nor the energy.
     
  11. Unhappyjetsfan

    Unhappyjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,025
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    It's the exactly the opposite. There's only two reasons to want to overpay Revis (and he's overpaid right now, so anything more just makes it worse):

    1. You don't understand the role the salary cap plays in the NFL, or
    2. You associate more with the player than the team and don't care if we win a championship as long as you get to wear your Revis jersey.

    That is SOJF loser attitude; you exemplify it. The guy is a pain in the ass and overpaid. Everyday that he is on the team, the team is farther away from winning a Super Bowl, not closer. All I care about is winning a championship.

    It's real simple ...

    The 31st pick in the draft and a league-average free agent cornerback for $2 million is worth far more than Revis for $16 million (and his hold out in two years after he's spent his signing bonus). It's not even debatable in my opinion.
     
  12. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Holy shit, you are off the rails here.

    The Jets are in cap hell THIS YEAR. Not next year. In fact trading Revis before June 1 WORSENS THE CAP!!!!!

    Next year, with Sanchez gone, the cap situation is much improved, and there will be plenty of room to fit a market rate Revis contract under the cap.

    And no one is talking about overpaying Revis. We who want him to stay want to sign him at the market rate. I think a fair price is $13mil, but you know what? We do not know if the Jets can get him at that rate BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT EVEN TRYING TO REACH A DEAL WITH HIM!!!

    The Jets have a history of bad draft picks. Will the Jets be closer to an SB with the best CB in the league or with two Kyle Wilsons and Vlad Duccasses?
     
  13. Lynkx

    Lynkx Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0

    If we are out of cap hell next year why put us right back into it with a massive albatross contract?
     
  14. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    To keep one of hte best defensive players in the league and the anchor of the Jets D, that's why. And it is not "cap hell" to be under the cap even if closer to it than without Revis's contract. If you are under the cap, you are under the cap. What is your point exactly?
     
  15. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Because we'd get to watch a great player playing CB. That's pretty much what it comes down to. Now whether that great player has any ability to lift the Jets to the next level or not? Well, other than 2009 there is no evidence that's the case and 2009 is a long time ago.

    BTW, related point that's kind of interesting: if you want Darrelle Revis to stay at all costs and you also want Rex Ryan gone, well that's the craziest possible position to be sitting in. There's no evidence at all that Darrelle Revis is an impact player without Rex scheming around him. If the Jets sign Revis to a huge contract and then let Rex go at the end of the year we are absolutely humped into 4-12ness for the forsee-able future.
     
    #675 Br4d, Mar 7, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2013
  16. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Brad believes the Jets would be a better team with worse corners.

    Heh. THat is pretty funny when you think about it.
     
  17. Lynkx

    Lynkx Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0

    You think spending anywhere from 13-17ish percent of the cap on a cornerback is worth the expense? You've got to be kidding me.

    Don't get me wrong, I love Revis, and I want to see him stay a Jet forever, but a good enough deal comes along and I trade him, because he will either destroy the Jets salary cap, or walk.
     
  18. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    What is destroying the Jets' cap now is they are overpaying crappy players. So let's get rid of the guy who has earned his pay. Not a smart move.

    Yes, in today's NFL, I would say $13 mil for Revis is a fair price for what he does on the field. And of course it is a simple truth of capitalist market economics that he will and should only make that much if the Jets think some other team is willing to pay him that much or more.

    It is funny how you don't even see the lack of logic in your position. What is the reason why the Jets might have to pay him $13 mil or even more? Because the fear is if he goes FA, some other team will pay him that much.

    And yet here you are saying I have got to be kidding you to say he is worth that much. It's simple market economics.

    As far as the Jets cap is concerned, I certainly see nothing wrong with paying that much of the available cap space on one of the two or three best defensive players in the league who is also the anchor of Ryan's defense. Again, if the Jets are not willing to do that, some other team will, or he will not draw that much compensation. And if some other team can do that under the same cap the Jets have, why can't the Jets?

    This year in particular it makes no sense to trade Revis, because that actually worsens the cap for 13. Perhaps you are not aware of that consideration.
     
  19. RochesterJet

    RochesterJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,906
    Likes Received:
    957
    BB you are out of control and obviously very emotional about keeping Revis. Emotion tends to distort logic.

    Logic is; Revis now is saying he want to be a jet, after "flirting with the 9ers and who-ever else may want his "services". He is all about one thing and one thing only, his compensation.

    Logic is; Revis has held out twice for more money. He has used the media as his platform (social media as well) to preach his worth (many ME first players do this).

    Logic is; the Jets are more than just a CB away from a run at a championship. Why would we tie more resources ($) up in the back end of our Defense with other more serious needs.

    Logic is; we are in cap hell currently (from bad contracts in the past). With a changeing of the guard, we need to move forward with team friendly contracts. Re-signing Revis is a move to the old.

    Logic is; Revis is comming off an ACL? Corner is a different position to come back quick from this injury. Yes AP came back but he is the one who dictates his direction and cuts, Revis has to react to it. He may never be the same, signing him to a big contract couold jepordize the jets for years to come.

    Logic is; cut bait and trade im for all of the above reasons...he knows it and the jets do as well...you my friend need to take a deep breath and move on.
     
  20. soh_vet

    soh_vet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    206
    Because it would be entirely impossible to take that 2014 $'s you don't give Mevi$ to keep Landry, sign better FA's at OLB / CB / FS or even improve offensive positions. Apparently if you don't sign Mevi$ as the best Def player on the field, you can't use that money for anything else? Nope nothing else, it's Mevi$ or bust :breakdance:
     

Share This Page