Do we really have a need at WR?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Mambo9, Jan 17, 2013.

  1. RevChez

    RevChez Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    When healthy, I think we have an above average unit. Not many teams have 4 starting WRs. If Hill can justify his draft status, this unit can be our strength (assuming they are all healthy).

    Problem is, each n every WR in there has injury history. Im pretty sure we had Clyde Gates start a game or two due to injuries. That tells u more than u need to know. Gotta resign Edwards. I hope Idzik (sp?) likes him.
     
  2. jetlife21

    jetlife21 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    278
    Whoever's saying we don't have a need at WR seriously lost it. Holmes probably won't be the same, Edwards is getting older if he is still even good anymore, and while Kerley looked promising he didn't even have that great of the year. If we're stuck with Sanchez again next year we're not going to do any better unless we can get him at least one more legitimate weapon.
    I think it'd be alot smarter to sign a WR and draft a rb then the other way around.
     
  3. SouthBayJetsfan4life

    SouthBayJetsfan4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    119
    I think after all that Braylon has been through, the Jets could definitely get him on the cheap.

    I don't the team should waste a 1st or 2nd round for a receiver, but anything between 3rd and 6th would be a good time.

    Looking at the corps as I see it, I would say it's average at best. Holmes is coming off an injury and a year older. The hope is that Hill will hold onto the ball more. I like Kerley as a slot recever. Gates is speed and that's it.
    I went to the Seattle game and I all I remember is that when Richard Sherman was covering him,he locked him up without even trying.

    IMO the receivers corps is a work in progress and he needs to be upgraded.
     
  4. 85inthehall

    85inthehall Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    39
    Bray is a vert minimum deal -- no one will offer more. Hill had knee issues and holmes foot -- Edwards played with fire and was productive in the game he played with the Jets and Sanchez.

    He is also good for hill 0-- same size and had drop issues -- Can be an asset if he can mentor him.
     
  5. CurbYourEnthusiasm

    CurbYourEnthusiasm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    72
    There is no reason to think Holmes won't be 100% next year. His injury isn't like an ACL/MCL where you have to question where he'll ever be the same again.

    Agree on Edwards. With that said I'd still take him back at the vet minimum.

    Kerley had a fine year considering the QB throwing to him. He is already a terrific slot receiver, however, asking him to do more would be a stretch.

    Hill is the biggest unknown of the group. If we have a solid #2 then there is no reason he can't thrive as the #4 guy.
     
  6. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    I've said this before, signing Braylon would be solidifying our WR corps and hopefully allow us to address our RB situation, which I feel is a more pressing need.
     
  7. PuMa

    PuMa Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed. We need a top 10 running back. Along with a solid Lb and offensive line picks
     
  8. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    N one is saying there ISN'T a need. We're just saying that there are more pressing needs on the team than WR right now. If a great prospect is there between reds 3-6, then take him. Otherwise, we should be looking at other positions to fill.
     
  9. ArmandJ

    ArmandJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    54
    Our WR's are pretty good right now. I'd add one more in the later rounds to be safe, but that's it. We should be able to sign Braylon back on vet minimums.
     
  10. blackssmagic

    blackssmagic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,452
    Likes Received:
    619
    Idont know if this has been mentioned but keep the same wideouts and finally get a good tightend in here instead
     
  11. PuMa

    PuMa Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Keller is a decent TE he just isnt a blocker which is why 4 out of 6 inside running plays go for 4 yards... Greene is slow though.
     
  12. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    No, we really won't have money left for free agents at that point. We're going to be barely double digits of cap space available and the cost of getting more cap space will be to put us in a bind in 2014.

    I don't expect the Jets to sign any tier 1 free agents this year.
     
  13. PuMa

    PuMa Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    0
    As long as We have some type of money for Revis and Landry

    ..maybe Franchise tag Cromartie?
     
  14. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Yeah, Holmes is vital to our passing game. Did we honestly expect Sanchez to light it up with Hill, Schillens, Gates and a rusty Edwards? I don't think WR is a huge need, but it is a need. I think we should bring in another guy who has a similar skillset to Holmes, that can compliment him and run deep routes until Hill gets where he needs to be. He could use a mentor.

    Homes - Hill - Kerley will be a decent unit. I believe that getting rid of Keller will be a huge mistake if they go that route. I don't see Braylon coming back. He was a desperation pick up late last year, although he was decent, catching all kinds of bad passes from Mark that almost got him killed. Personally I'd bring him in as #4 or #5 if we could (the price will be right), but we do need another WR that can start opposite Holmes on the outside that we don't have to worry about dropping tons of easy passes, even if it's just for a year or 2. Edwards might be able to be that guy, but he's still a question mark at this point. If he can return to 2010 form, I'd be very happy. I wouldn't mind adding somebody like Percy Harvin.
     
    #54 Barcs, Jan 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  15. laxin

    laxin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    23
    No one expected Sanchez to light it up. I, and Im sure many others as well, expected Sanchez to protect the ball and simply be a "game manager". Its his 4th year, he should be able to take the offense by the horns and turn it into something worth while. Our expectations of him are so low that we want him to just not turn the ball over. A good game for him would be 200 yard, 58% completion percentage and 1 turnover... Sadly, thats reality. If he could put up those number, we consistently, we wouldve made the playoffs.



    As for this thread, I dont think we should be thinking in terms of position, but more so playmakers. Thats what this team lacks tremendously. As much as some people will praise Holmes, he's nothing more than an aging #2 WR right now that can make some very nice catches. Hill is a complete unknown. I would just consider him a #4 WR. And thats being generous. Kerley is a very good #3, but thats about his ceiling.

    If we are in position to draft a playmaker at good value. You do it. If he's a WR? You do it. This group is most certainly not built for the long-haul and since we are most likely (or should be) in rebuild mode, WR is definitely a need. It may not be an immediate need, but it will be in a year or two. Wouldnt you like to finally draft for the future and have a vision so that when we draft our franchise QB (hopefully in 2014) we have a solid young group in place for him? I sure as hell would.

    If someone like Nuk Hopkins, Tavon Austin, Cordarelle Patterson, Markus Wheaton or Quinton Patton are available in the 2nd or 3rd round and present very good value, you draft them without a doubt.
     
  16. Jetaho

    Jetaho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,141
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Agree 100%. We need to draft and develop dynamic skill players. Kerley and Hill are a start. I agree that Holmes is an overpaid WR2 at this point in his career. Other than that, it's a bunch of JAGs. There is no depth. One injury and we are stuck with Clyde Gates. If there's a better QB available, draft him, and if there's a better RB available, draft him, but don't foreclose drafting a dynamic playmaker on the false assumption that we are all set.

    Good teams develop players at the skill positions. Look at GB with Driver, Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Cobb. Look at the Giants and Nicks, Cruz, Randle, Barden, and Hixon. They can absorb injuries and have guys who can step up when someone is out. Of course, they have viable QBs, but the fact remains that they have invested in playmakers even when it wasn't perceived as a pressing need. We should do the same using a BPA approach.
     
  17. LongIslandBlitz

    LongIslandBlitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Messages:
    13,325
    Likes Received:
    4,083
    Our wide recivering core are the who's who of practice squad player's except for ,ya have Clyde "Practice Squad Player on 31 other teams" Gates in the slot,i wonder if that could fit on his jersey,Stephen"Throw me the ball so i can drop it" Hill, Braylon"Cut By Playoff Teams"Edwards Chaz"What the fuck am I doing here" Scheilnz and SantonioHolmes the only legit player we have , Kerley is good to, So we have 2 WR's
     
    #57 LongIslandBlitz, Jan 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  18. truthbtold

    truthbtold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,891
    Likes Received:
    1,610
    If we get some OL help I have no problem going into 2013 with our current crop of WR's, RB's and TE's. Just get a goddamn COMPETENT QB in here, and a OC who has a clue.

    With our defense, we don't need an explosive offense to win. We just need an offense that doesn't constantly leave points on the field for us, and giftwrap points for the opposition.
     
  19. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    We need an explosive offense. The Jets can't be looking to score 400 pts and settling for 375 when the Pats are going for 500+ every season. Yeah, when Brady is gone that will change but right now the Jets need to be looking to score on something approaching the level the Pats do. We keep getting blown out by them once a year because their offense is twice as good as ours and that's not all on Sanchez.
     
  20. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    2,301
    Jets will need a quality WR coach before WR depth.

    If whoever did magic on Braylon (I think it was Henry Ellard) tags along and helps Hill out as well, having Hill and Edwards on both split end will help a ton for the entire offense. Nacho sucked big time - but having WRs dropping the ball all season long like they did this season was not helping Nacho one bit. Either Sanjay Lal is a dumb fuck, or Sparano is a moron (or both - this is my vote in fact.)
     
    #60 Zach, Jan 18, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013

Share This Page