Is 2013's Salary Cap Driving the Jets 2012 Decisions?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by CowboysFan, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. Aewhistory

    Aewhistory Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    290
    Being a billionaire has nothing to do with it. He could be a trillionaire, but the Jets are still constrained by the same cap limits as all the other NFL teams. This isn't about what Woody can afford, this is about what the Jets can afford to spend under the cap.
     
  2. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    When the Jets actually had the window cranked open the thing that did the heavy cranking was Woody's wallet. The Jets had one of the highest pay rolls in the league over the period from 2008 to 2010. He put his money where his mouth was.

    Now that had a lot to do with trying to make more money out of PSL's but nobody can say that Woody didn't put every dime he could reasonably have spent into the process. That continued with his willingness to pick up another through the roof salary in Asomugha in the very short free agent season last year.
     
  3. Aewhistory

    Aewhistory Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    290
    I can see that point. What I'm just trying to say is that it doesn't really work the other way around. Woody having big bucks allows us to spend the max, but no matter how much money he has we will still be limited by the cap ultimately. For instance, if we had picked up Asomugha we would have had to
    cut somewhere else in order to deal with the cap. See what I mean? This seems to be why some are arguing we are making moves that save a few hundred K. It isn't about Woody's money but how much we can spend under the cap.

    Otoh, I have to admit that there are some areas (many outside of cap considerations) where Woody's money probably makes a difference, like hiring coaches and, as you mentioned, being able to absorb certain types of ultra-expensive contracts.
     
  4. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    Considering how cheap Tanny is (one of the reasons we have bad depth is because he clearly stated on HK that he wants to spend the minimum on every non-starter on the team) it wouldn't surprise me...
     
  5. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    So you are willing to lose 11 starters? Glad you're not the GM.
     
  6. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    On a well stocked team with a plan to replenish every season maybe 4 or 5 of those guys would be back next year. The guys too expensive to be backups and not good enough to be starters would be the first to go. The guys over 30 or headed for a deal at 29 or 30 would be next.
     
  7. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    9,034
    Likes Received:
    1,874
    i know the wood man had a press conference today, i heard a little bit of it and he sounded like a jackass as usual. my question is did anyone ask him about this? if the cap ramifications regarding these players were creating the situation with playing time that we are seeing now?

    god i hate woody johnson, please oh please can you please get together with the wilpons and figure out a way to sell both teams? please
     
  8. TTTTebowAndTheJets

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't bother... He just doesn't get the concept of a "cap"... Kinda like our government not understanding a debt ceiling :p
     
  9. JetsUK

    JetsUK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    7,079
    Likes Received:
    3,097
    if it really needs explaining then no, what I was saying was in response to another post that we had a load of free agents next year and I was making the point that whilst we do have a lot of FAs none are premium players or likely to command especially high salaries - its not like next year we have revis, cro, mangold, ferguson and Wilkerson all coming up for new deals.
     
  10. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    This team is 3-6 this year and has been blown out in half of their losses. They're 3-9 in the last 12 games that matter. Would it be such a bad thing to lose 11 starters if that trend continues?
     
  11. xxedge72x

    xxedge72x 2018 Gang Green QB Guru Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,286
    Likes Received:
    3,954
    If the Jets resign name brand guys like Keller then they're accepting mediocrity and the cycle will continue.

    Let the free agents walk, and dump the crap (Pace).

    Only Revis deserves new money and I'd bet anything he doesn't get it.
     
  12. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Starters who almost certainly aren't part of the next window:

    NT - Sione Pouha
    LOLB - Calvin Pace
    ROLB - Bryan Thomas
    FS - Yeremiah Bell

    LG - Matt Slauson
    RG - Brandon Moore
    FB - Lex Hilliard

    Starters who probably won't be around:

    SS - LaRon Landry

    RT - Austin Howard
    WR - Santonio Holmes
    QB - Mark Sanchez
    RB - Shonn Greene

    That's a lot of guys who are kind of hanging on at this point. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see 11 new starters on this team by 2014.
     

Share This Page