not real familiar with new york local news, but my understanding is new york daily news is half a step over TMZ/Enquirer style reporting....look at all the papers they sold/web hits they got out of this bullshit
if he did indeed use months old quotes just to stir up shit he deserves every bit of flak they are going to give him, and based on the past it will be a shit ton of flak
Your right. They were terrible last week against Cincinnati . That was one game I actually wanted them to win in case we won our game. we both know how that turned out. Giants fans suck
as info from twitter Chris Carlin @ChrisCarlinSNY I couldn't be more excited for #SNYLM at 6. We name the unnamed. Plus, we explain how a team unites by bashing their backup QB. #jets
Every NFL QB beats Manning and Brady on the road in consecutive games (and almost beats the Steelers after that)? I would agree with you but, statistically, Sanchez showed up in two separate playoffs (making all of your counter-examples frivolous): GP CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG TD INT FUM RAT 2009 3 41 68 60.3 539 7.93 4 2 0 92.7 2010 3 54 89 60.7 616 6.92 5 1 1 95.5 Let's look at intra-season inconsistency (more valid than comparing seasons): Year Game Pass Rating 09 GM1 84.3 09 GM2 101.1 09 GM3 81.4 09 GM4 27 09 GM5 87.5 09 GM6 8.3 09 GM7 107 09 GM8 100.3 09 GM9 59.3 09 GM10 37.1 09 GM11 79 09 GM12 92.1 09 GM13 49.7 09 GM14 78 09 GM15 60.2 10 GM1 56.4 10 GM2 124.3 10 GM3 120.5 10 GM4 106.4 10 GM5 59.9 10 GM6 60.1 10 GM7 43.3 10 GM8 82.9 10 GM9 87.2 10 GM10 100.2 10 GM11 71.4 10 GM12 27.8 10 GM13 45.3 10 GM14 81.1 10 GM15 84.2 2011 was by-far his most consistent year (not saying much) 11 GM1 88.7 11 GM2 85.8 11 GM3 93.8 11 GM4 30.5 11 GM5 105.6 11 GM6 95.6 11 GM7 87.1 11 GM8 92.9 11 GM9 64.7 11 GM10 67.9 11 GM11 90.2 11 GM12 83.5 11 GM13 121.3 11 GM14 67.8 11 GM15 54.2 11 GM16 65.5 Skimming the numbers the Std Dev is high enough to indicate inconsistent play. This response negates your earlier refutation of my original point. Not sure which direction you're taking but it's unclear. Such an obvious logical fallacy that I'll just say whatever entertains you.
I'd hate my team if, despite having a multiple Super Bowl winning QB, he *basically* always manages to throw 1 INT per game.
So the Slauson quote has me wondering, how old are all the quotes in this article? Manish used a month to a month and half old quote in a new article without clarifying that. Makes you wonder. The pitfalls of trading for Tebow and being in NY
Maybe Bart Scott was right about the locker room being unified now. Honestly, I'm starting to think it was some writer trying to start shit and troll the Jets' fanbase. Look how we had a 22 page thread falling for it, hook line and sinker. Off topic, but is the biggest New York Jets forum?
Here is Manish clarifying via twitter, just now: Manish Mehta @MMehtaNYDN Matt Slauson told me that supported Mark Sanchez and referred to Tim Tebow as "an athlete" three weeks ago. #nyj To your off topic, when I google "new york jets forum" it comes up first for what it's worth
Well, three weeks ago, Mark Sanchez played the game of his life against the New England Patriots in their house. Herp derp, of course he wouldn't be high on Tebow. Had our defense made a stop on that last drive, the Tebow talk would have died.
Tebow is a distraction? Really? These are grown men. STFU and play hard instead of collecting a paycheck every week despite looking like garbage.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/53-unnamed-players-on-jets-roster-say-tebow-is-ter,30374/ Little bit of humor.
lol ... now that was pretty damn funny. Probably deserved its own thread if it had a story following the pic.
Honestly, I'm not a big Tebow supporter but seriously whoever said that needs to grow a pair and put his name on it or not say it. I also think stuff like that shouldn't even be said. Whoever said that is a horrible teammate.
so he didn't give that exact quote, just said that Sanchez is the starter and Tebow is an athlete....stop the presses
