1. Mancrush? I dunno where you got that from. I've seen him play and I think he's a great player who put up stats and won games. When it comes down to it, that's all that matters. 2. Yes. But that is just one game.
One game with a type of offense he would use with the Jets (under center/tradition) against a defensive talent that isn't as good as NFL but closer than what he faced all season.
Oh oops, thinking of someone else. That's even worse for him becuase everyone considered him a system QB like Colt and he didn't prove anyone wrong. And once we go away from Sanchez, I'd rather stay away from a short QB like him. I'd rather go taller/average height QB
Interesting. Did not know that. I don't really get what the point of a team having their own practice squad is in that case
I'm going to trust 32 NFL and various other people such as Mayock, Kiper etc... who think the guy isn't an NFL QB over sombeody who is in love with the guy because a former high school teammate played with him in college.
Because you have to keep the player on the active roster for four games. 53-man roster spots are valuable. Unlike this thread. Case Keenum isn't changing anything, really? I know he was productive in college, but so have a lot of other people, including Mark Sanchez, Tim Tebow and Greg McElroy.
WTF. Sanchez played a decent game. We should have won. It should have never been OT, but receivers keep dropping easy catches. You can't blame Sanchez for the special teams screw ups and dropped passes. Plus he threw for 70 more yards than Brady. He had a couple mistakes, but the game was winnable. Pats got lucky we dug our own graves. How many EASY drops did Hill have?
Holy sht I don't believe I wasted 10 seconds on reading this stupid post. Case Keenun? C'mon son. Great college careers doesn't mean a player will excel in the NFL. Keenun was a system QB.
Two decent games don't make up for 4-years of below-average play. Define a "system QB"? How is it all but guaranteed that he will fail in the NFL?
