Softer schedule? Look at weeks 10-13. The Titans are emerging as well. Ask I've said the Titans are better than their record indicates. A win over Miami is essential.
Yeah, how does that fall on Sanchez for the playcall not be play action or even Sanchez under the huddle? The poster I quoted blame the inconsistent play calling on Sanchez, but that was inconsistent without it being on Sanchez it seems You already said that. My two problems were 3rd and 1 at the 2 and not passing at 2:01 left.
Yeah and I can pick a handful plays that fell outside of Sanchez's control that were negative. I could pick a handful plays that fell on Sanchez's control that were negative. I could pick a handful plays that fell outside of Sanchez's control that were positive. I could pick a handful of plays that fell on Sanchez's control that were positive.
Sporano is pathetically weak. He's lucky to have Chez assume the role of the goat- but, that won't last long.
I used to have a coach who said, "Every football game is decided by 3-5 plays. The trick is, you don't know which plays those will be." My point is, two or three bad plays is all you need to turn a game in the NFL.
I saw it as a poorly underthrown pass imo so I had Sanchez as a - 9 after the 1st half. Jets were on the 36 when he threw the int so that pick certainly gave up points. Whether its a FD or TD is arguable I suppose. I'm not typically an anti-Sanchez guy but thought he really had a piss poor performance tonight.
Really I thought he had a decent performance. We were down 10 in the 4th, we marched down 94 yards. Then got good field position and for once didn't go 3 and out, but again got into FG range. I thought it was decent. I agree. But some people are only cherry picking negative plays that don't include Sanhcez and some are cherry picking negative plays that only include Sanchez.
Sanchez played poorly and that was the difference in the game. the pats were mediocre and should have been beaten, but sanchez's poor decision making and execution cost the Jets the win. it is what it is. he's not very good.
I thought the Jets had a decent performance in spite of Sanchez. I chalked the 90 yard drive up to soft coverage and the Pats willingness to take time off the clock. It was a 7 minute drive on a defense that was happy to trade time for yards. And we did get into FG range again but you left out the drive where Sanchez moved the Jets from the Pats 16 to the Pats 25.
You mean the drive where we called 2 runs and bootleg to take the lead? What drive are you talking about? If you are talking about the game tying field goal, Sanchez hit Keller for 21 on that drive and then Hill dropped it. Yeah I don't think the Pats were letting us march into the end zone. Clearly there was a lot of time left and the Patriots weren't trying to milk the clock on offense after we scored. They could have ended the game with a 3 and out there. I highly doubt they were playing prevent with 10 minutes left in the game. See I thought the Jets had a decent performance including a decent performance from Sanchez. He had one pick, one fumble (end of game), and one bad handoff that I give him 33% blame of. I would have to see the replay to decide more of who to blame. Slauson got blown up there. So yeah, I thought 28/41 for 328 1 TD, 1 INT and 1 fumble isn't playing in spite of Sanchez. That's like saying the Jets played well in spite of their defense. There were little things from everyone that contributed to the loss, including the defense. I thought Sanchez played decent, an average game. He did help put us in position to win, like the other units, but like the other units he didn't push us over the edge to get that win
Not the one where Hill dropped it. I'm talking about the last drive in the 4th quarter where the Jets took the lead. Slauson definitely got blown up. I suppose my opinion could change on this but the way I saw it, Sanchez has got to stick that ball to Greene and he didn't. I agree that Sanchez did not have a terrible stat line. We could pick out several things and say well the Jets would have won if "this" did not happen, i.e. Cromartie makes the interception off the easy opportunity, the Pats don't get the kick off return for a TD, etc. There were several plays that could have turned the game. My opinion is that Sanchez gave up more points than he redeemed. I think where we differ is that I thought Sanchez could have done more. He could have won this game for the Jets if he had performed better on several plays. I want to see him step up and win the game, not get sacked for 10 yards to make a game tying FG more difficult, throw an easy interception at the opponent's goal line or fumble the ball to end the game in OT.
Ah okay, I saw Pat 25 to Pat 16 not the way you wrote it. Read it completely wrong. I agree, if he stepped up and won it, I would say a good game from him. But he didn't so I have it at average. There were so many poor plays this game outside of Sanchez's hands that I can't say he had a bad game. For reference a bad game for me is one where the QB mostly loses it, a decent game is one where the QB wins/loses, has usually a zero net effect, a good game is the QB made more winning plays than losing plays. Now obviously I can't fit games strictly into 3 categories so there are many in betweens, but for the season I have BUF- good Pitt- Bad to decent (so closer to bad) Mia- decent to bad (closer to decent but not at it) SF- bad HOU- decent INDY- good* (but an asterisk because we didn't need him much, but when we did he was good) NE- decent
