If not Sanchez then who?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Jeti, Sep 17, 2012.

  1. Jeti

    Jeti Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Messages:
    5,356
    Likes Received:
    1,111
    I see a lot guys saying Mark hasn't changed will never change we need a new QB, etc.

    Well if we move on from Mark who do you think will help us

    Matt Barkley
    Tyler Wilson
    Geno Smith
    Tyler Bray

    are the only QB's in the draft I think with a decent future in the NFL but are they going to be any better than Sanchez

    Do we sign one

    Joe Flacco- will be tagged
    Matt Schaub- who knows but he's old


    trade for one, a disgruntled back up

    Matt Flynn- stuck in Seattle
    Colt McCoy- meh, who knows
    Colin Kapernick- stuck behind Alex Smith, raw but talented
    TJ Yates- performed well last year when Schaub went out
    Kirk Cousins- good back up like his game being developed behind RG3
    Matt Cassell- If KC doesn't make progress he'll be cut or traded I like his game though

    Within

    Tim Tebow- please no
    Greg McElroy- no thanks

    regardless Sanchez has another guaranteed year on his deal but really finding a QB is very difficult, you either get lucky in the draft, suck so bad they fall to your lap or trade for an underutilized back up

    In Dirty We Trust
     
  2. McFreek

    McFreek New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Schaub is out, he signed an extension last week. IIRC it was about 4yrs, $62 million.
    But no one that list really impresses me.
     
  3. DevTeam

    DevTeam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    70
    Sanchez is fine. We need a better running back.

    And also - I never thought I'd say this - please bring back TJ Conley. Malone STINKS.
     
  4. b.reyes16

    b.reyes16 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    697
    I really don't feel like going through the years of growing pains again. It's rather annoying. We need to stick with Mark or we'll be back to that whole rebuilding thing. Giants stuck with Eli. Look at how that turned out.
     
  5. b.reyes16

    b.reyes16 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    697
    I thought Malone punted pretty well yesterday, no?
     
  6. jerseyjay14

    jerseyjay14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,138
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    im fine with sanchez... but if we do move on, id prefer tebow to anyone on that list
     
  7. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,996
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    He had a few very good punts and a couple of ugly shanks. He's already better than Conley though.
     
  8. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,173
    Likes Received:
    14,469
    This thread sucks. Just saying. It's Week 3. Sanchez played amazing Week 1, then played poorly against the Steelers in Pittsburgh (As most QB's do). I can't believe this thread has already been made. Okay, I can believe it.

    Also: I would take Sanchez over every single person you named as alternative options. haha.
     
  9. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    In this league, you either should have a very good starting QB or be in the process of developing a guy you think can be a very good starting QB.

    Sanchez is still young enough where I don't see the point in abandoning developing him, just to appease a small section of the fan base who don't understand this.

    Exactly. If we give up on Sanchez, we're back at square one: trying another draft pick hoping for the best, or getting someone else that's either a free agent or backup QB that we strike lightning with.


    I will say I think some people are overrating Sanchez's performance in week 1 a tiny bit. Receivers were wide open most of that game. Sanchez played very well, but his job was made a lot easier by the Bills secondary.

    By the same token, as easy as the Bills' secondary made Sanchez's job in week 1, that's how hard the Steelers made it yesterday.
     
  10. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,996
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    Hey, where's ouchy? I was sure he would be able to present some suggestions to the problems that he's been crying about for the last few hours.

    :rolleyes:
     
  11. Jetdic

    Jetdic Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    9
    Maybe we should get some receivers that catch the ball and then focus on Sanchez. I thought he looked pretty decent all things considered. The receivers killed him and their was PI on the long bomb to Hill. They didn't call it because there was a terrible PI call against the Steelers a few players earlier where no one even touched Holmes.
     
  12. Bannon

    Bannon New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    0
    If it doesn't work out with Sanchez, go all in with Tebow, design an offense actually geared towards his strengths, and start making room in the trophy case for a Lombardi.
     
  13. HAYN

    HAYN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,180
    Likes Received:
    345
    I thought Sanchez played pretty well yesterday. His numbers may say otherwise but our receivers dropped a bunch of catchable balls. I wouldn't give up on him just yet. Give him more playmakers and shore up the O Line and he'll be above average.
     
  14. Milliner is your Mommy

    Milliner is your Mommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    110
    Thats just never going to happen. Not anytime soon atleast. Tebow has a lot to fix before he can take over an offense.
     
  15. b.reyes16

    b.reyes16 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    697
    :drunk: :eek:hmy:
     
  16. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,996
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    It would take years to re-tool the roster and the coaching staff to fit Tebow's strengths and you just don't do that for a quarterback that can't pass.
     
  17. RevisXt

    RevisXt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2011
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Last week's game shows that Sanchez has it in him. Our receivers weren't getting open and Holmes dropped many a near perfect pass. This thread would have showed up the first off game Sanchez had, whether the 2nd week or 7th. I don't get the hate when its obvious there are bigger problems than him.
     
  18. TurkJetFan

    TurkJetFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,468
    Likes Received:
    2,236
    what makes you say Malone stinks? I thought he did a fine job yesterday.

    regarding the OP question, i see no reason to move on from Sanchez at all. He needs a better supporting cast.
     
  19. GordonGecko

    GordonGecko Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    7,220
    Likes Received:
    2,279
    I vote for GreenHornet
     
  20. McFreek

    McFreek New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    even if we do get another qb this would involve completing sucking (2-14 for a top qb), which takes away picks needed to address the same holes that still exist, rt, upgraded/complimentary rb, non-holmes like wr, lb, safety. Most of these would have to come via draft. Then we'll be in this same situation again 3-4 yrs from now
     

Share This Page